Bérard Emilie, Bongard Vanina, Dallongeville Jean, Arveiler Dominique, Amouyel Philippe, Wagner Aline, Cottel Dominique, Haas Bernadette, Ferrières Jean, Ruidavets Jean-Bernard
Department of Epidemiology, Health Economics and Public Health, UMR1027 INSERM-Toulouse University, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU), Toulouse, France.
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM UMR744, Pasteur Institute of Lille, Lille Nord de France University-UDSL, Lille, France.
Prev Med. 2015 Dec;81:195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Measurement of expired-air carbon monoxide (EACO) is commonly used to ascertain non-smoking status, although it can also reflect exposures not related to smoking. Our aim was to assess 16-year mortality according to EACO measured at baseline, in a general population.
Our analysis was based on the Third French MONICA population survey (1994-1997). Causes of death were obtained 16 years after inclusion, and assessment of determinants of mortality was based on Cox modeling.
EACO was measured in 2232 apparently healthy participants aged 35-64. During follow-up, 195 deaths occurred (19% were due to cardio-vascular (CV) causes and 49% to cancer). At baseline, the mean EACO was 11.8 (±7.4)ppm, 4.6 (±2.5)ppm, 4.3 (±2.2)ppm for current, former and never smokers, respectively (P<0.001). After adjustment for main mortality risk factors and smoking, the hazard ratio (HR) for total mortality was 1.03[95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.06] per 1-unit increase in EACO, and it was 1.04[1.01-1.07] for cancer mortality. Adjusted HR for CV mortality was 1.05[1.01-1.10] but did not remain significant after additional adjustment for smoking (0.98[0.91-1.04]). Interactions between EACO and smoking were not significant.
In a general population, baseline EACO is an independent predictor of 16-year all-cause and cancer mortality, after adjustment for confounders including smoking. Given that the effect of EACO is similar among smokers and non-smokers, EACO is probably not solely related to smoking but could also be a marker of inhaled ambient carbon monoxide and/or endogenous production. Besides, smoking better predicts CV mortality than EACO.
呼出气体一氧化碳(EACO)测量常用于确定非吸烟状态,尽管它也能反映与吸烟无关的暴露情况。我们的目的是在普通人群中,根据基线时测量的EACO评估16年死亡率。
我们的分析基于第三次法国MONICA人群调查(1994 - 1997年)。纳入研究16年后获取死亡原因,死亡率决定因素的评估基于Cox模型。
对2232名年龄在35 - 64岁的明显健康参与者测量了EACO。随访期间,发生了195例死亡(19%死于心血管(CV)疾病,49%死于癌症)。基线时,当前吸烟者、既往吸烟者和从不吸烟者的平均EACO分别为11.8(±7.4)ppm、4.6(±2.5)ppm、4.3(±2.2)ppm(P<0.001)。在对主要死亡风险因素和吸烟情况进行调整后,EACO每增加1个单位,总死亡率的风险比(HR)为1.03[95%置信区间:1.01 - 1.06],癌症死亡率的HR为1.04[1.01 - 1.07]。CV死亡率的调整后HR为1.05[1.01 - 1.10],但在对吸烟情况进行额外调整后不再显著(0.98[0.91 - 1.04])。EACO与吸烟之间的相互作用不显著。
在普通人群中,经包括吸烟在内的混杂因素调整后,基线EACO是16年全因死亡率和癌症死亡率的独立预测因素。鉴于吸烟者和非吸烟者中EACO的影响相似,EACO可能不仅与吸烟有关,还可能是吸入环境一氧化碳和/或内源性产生的标志物。此外,吸烟比EACO更能预测CV死亡率。