Ning Zhong H, Long Shuang, Zhou Yuan Y, Peng Zi Y, Sun Yi N, Chen Si W, Su Li M, Zhao Yuan H
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;73(2):613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
The lethal toxicity values (log 1/LD(50)) of 527 aliphatic and aromatic compounds in oral, intravenous, intramuscular and intraperitoneal routes were used to investigate the relationships of log 1/LD(50) from different exposure routes. Regression analysis shows that the log 1/LD(50) values are well correlated between intravenous and intraperitoneal or intramuscular injections. However, the correlations between oral and intravenous or intraperitoneal routes are relatively poor. Comparison of the average residuals indicates that intravenous injection is the most sensitive exposure route and oral administration is the least sensitive exposure route. This is attributed to the difference in kinetic process of toxicity testing. The toxic effect of a chemical can be similar or significantly different between exposure routes, depending on the absorption rates of chemicals into blood. Inclusion of hydrophobic parameter and fractions of ionic forms can improve the correlations between intravenous and intraperitoneal or oral routes, but not between intraperitoneal and oral routes. This is due to the differences of absorption rate in different exposure environments from different routes. Several factors, such as experimental uncertainty, metabolism and toxic kinetics, can affect the correlations between intravenous and intraperitoneal or oral routes.
利用527种脂肪族和芳香族化合物经口、静脉、肌肉和腹腔注射途径的致死毒性值(log 1/LD(50))来研究不同暴露途径下log 1/LD(50)之间的关系。回归分析表明,静脉注射与腹腔或肌肉注射的log 1/LD(50)值具有良好的相关性。然而,经口与静脉或腹腔途径之间的相关性相对较差。平均残差的比较表明,静脉注射是最敏感的暴露途径,口服给药是最不敏感的暴露途径。这归因于毒性测试动力学过程的差异。一种化学物质的毒性效应在不同暴露途径之间可能相似或显著不同,这取决于化学物质进入血液的吸收速率。纳入疏水参数和离子形式分数可以改善静脉与腹腔或经口途径之间的相关性,但不能改善腹腔与经口途径之间的相关性。这是由于不同途径在不同暴露环境中的吸收速率存在差异。实验不确定性、代谢和毒理学动力学等几个因素会影响静脉与腹腔或经口途径之间的相关性。