Suppr超能文献

暴露途径对大鼠经口、静脉注射、腹腔注射和肌肉注射途径致死毒性关系的影响。

Effect of exposure routes on the relationships of lethal toxicity to rats from oral, intravenous, intraperitoneal and intramuscular routes.

作者信息

Ning Zhong H, Long Shuang, Zhou Yuan Y, Peng Zi Y, Sun Yi N, Chen Si W, Su Li M, Zhao Yuan H

机构信息

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.

State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Vegetation Restoration, School of Environment, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, Jilin 130117, PR China.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;73(2):613-9. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

Abstract

The lethal toxicity values (log 1/LD(50)) of 527 aliphatic and aromatic compounds in oral, intravenous, intramuscular and intraperitoneal routes were used to investigate the relationships of log 1/LD(50) from different exposure routes. Regression analysis shows that the log 1/LD(50) values are well correlated between intravenous and intraperitoneal or intramuscular injections. However, the correlations between oral and intravenous or intraperitoneal routes are relatively poor. Comparison of the average residuals indicates that intravenous injection is the most sensitive exposure route and oral administration is the least sensitive exposure route. This is attributed to the difference in kinetic process of toxicity testing. The toxic effect of a chemical can be similar or significantly different between exposure routes, depending on the absorption rates of chemicals into blood. Inclusion of hydrophobic parameter and fractions of ionic forms can improve the correlations between intravenous and intraperitoneal or oral routes, but not between intraperitoneal and oral routes. This is due to the differences of absorption rate in different exposure environments from different routes. Several factors, such as experimental uncertainty, metabolism and toxic kinetics, can affect the correlations between intravenous and intraperitoneal or oral routes.

摘要

利用527种脂肪族和芳香族化合物经口、静脉、肌肉和腹腔注射途径的致死毒性值(log 1/LD(50))来研究不同暴露途径下log 1/LD(50)之间的关系。回归分析表明,静脉注射与腹腔或肌肉注射的log 1/LD(50)值具有良好的相关性。然而,经口与静脉或腹腔途径之间的相关性相对较差。平均残差的比较表明,静脉注射是最敏感的暴露途径,口服给药是最不敏感的暴露途径。这归因于毒性测试动力学过程的差异。一种化学物质的毒性效应在不同暴露途径之间可能相似或显著不同,这取决于化学物质进入血液的吸收速率。纳入疏水参数和离子形式分数可以改善静脉与腹腔或经口途径之间的相关性,但不能改善腹腔与经口途径之间的相关性。这是由于不同途径在不同暴露环境中的吸收速率存在差异。实验不确定性、代谢和毒理学动力学等几个因素会影响静脉与腹腔或经口途径之间的相关性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验