Collins Susan E, Jones Connor B, Hoffmann Gail, Nelson Lonnie A, Hawes Starlyn M, Grazioli Véronique S, Mackelprang Jessica L, Holttum Jessica, Kaese Greta, Lenert James, Herndon Patrick, Clifasefi Seema L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington - Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359911, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, 1100 Olive Way, Suite 1200, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jan;27:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are more prevalent among homeless individuals than in the general population, and homeless individuals are disproportionately affected by alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. Unfortunately, abstinence-based approaches are neither desirable to nor highly effective for most members of this population. Recent research has indicated that homeless people aspire to clinically significant recovery goals beyond alcohol abstinence, including alcohol harm reduction and quality-of-life improvement. However, no research has documented this population's preferred pathways toward self-defined recovery. Considering principles of patient-centred care, a richer understanding of this population's desired pathways to recovery may help providers better engage and support them.
Participants (N=50) had lived experience of homelessness and AUDs and participated in semi-structured interviews regarding histories of homelessness, alcohol use, and abstinence-based treatment as well as suggestions for improving alcohol treatment. Conventional content analysis was used to ascertain participants' perceptions of abstinence-based treatment and mutual-help modalities, while it additionally revealed alternative pathways to recovery.
Most participants reported involvement in abstinence-based modalities for reasons other than the goal of achieving long-term abstinence from alcohol (e.g., having shelter in winter months, "taking a break" from alcohol use, being among "like-minded people"). In contrast, most participants preferred alternative pathways to recovery, including fulfilling basic needs (e.g., obtaining housing), using harm reduction approaches (e.g., switching from higher to lower alcohol content beverages), engaging in meaningful activities (e.g., art, outings, spiritual/cultural activities), and making positive social connections.
Most people with the lived experience of homelessness and AUDs we interviewed were uninterested in abstinence-based modalities as a means of attaining long-term alcohol abstinence. These individuals do, however, have creative ideas about alternative pathways to recovery that treatment providers may support to reduce alcohol-related harm and enhance quality of life.
酒精使用障碍(AUDs)在无家可归者中比在普通人群中更为普遍,且无家可归者受酒精相关发病率和死亡率的影响尤为严重。不幸的是,基于戒酒的方法对这一人群的大多数成员来说既不可取也效果不佳。最近的研究表明,无家可归者渴望实现超越戒酒的具有临床意义的康复目标,包括减少酒精危害和改善生活质量。然而,尚无研究记录该人群实现自我定义康复的首选途径。考虑到以患者为中心的护理原则,更深入地了解该人群期望的康复途径可能有助于医疗服务提供者更好地参与并支持他们。
参与者(N = 50)有过无家可归和酒精使用障碍的经历,参与了关于无家可归史、酒精使用和基于戒酒的治疗的半结构化访谈,以及关于改善酒精治疗的建议。采用传统内容分析法确定参与者对基于戒酒的治疗和互助模式的看法,同时还揭示了其他康复途径。
大多数参与者表示参与基于戒酒的模式是出于实现长期戒酒目标之外的原因(例如,在冬季有住所、“暂时戒酒”、与“志同道合的人”在一起)。相比之下,大多数参与者更喜欢其他康复途径,包括满足基本需求(例如,获得住房)、采用减少危害的方法(例如,从高酒精含量饮料转向低酒精含量饮料)、参与有意义的活动(例如,艺术、郊游、精神/文化活动)以及建立积极的社会联系。
我们采访的大多数有过无家可归和酒精使用障碍经历的人对基于戒酒的模式作为实现长期戒酒的手段不感兴趣。然而,这些人对其他康复途径有创造性的想法,治疗提供者可以提供支持以减少酒精相关危害并提高生活质量。