Van Landuyt L, Polyzos N P, De Munck N, Blockeel C, Van de Velde H, Verheyen G
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Nov;30(11):2509-18. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
What is the effect of artificial shrinkage by laser-induced collapse before vitrification on the implantation potential after transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts?
The artificial shrinkage by laser-induced collapse did not significantly increase the implantation rate per transferred collapsed blastocyst (37.6%) compared with non-collapsed blastocysts (28.9%) [odds ratio (OR): 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-2.83].
Retrospective studies have demonstrated that artificial shrinkage of the blastocyst prior to vitrification can have a positive effect on blastocyst survival after warming. A recent study found a similar survival rate but higher implantation rate for collapsed blastocysts. So far, no randomized controlled trial has been conducted to investigate the implantation potential of collapsed blastocysts.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective randomized trial. Patients were recruited from December 2011 until April 2014 and warming cycles were included until July 2014. Patients were randomized in the fresh cycle if blastocysts were available for vitrification and were allocated to the study or control arm according to a computer-generated list. In the study group, blastocysts underwent laser-induced collapse before vitrification. In the control group, blastocysts were vitrified without collapsing.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In total, 443 patients signed informed consent and 270 patients had blastocysts vitrified. One-hundred and thirty-five patients were allocated to the study group and 135 to the control group. Sixty-nine patients from the study group and 69 from the control group returned for at least one warming cycle in which 85 and 93 blastocysts were warmed in the first cycle, respectively. Primary outcome was implantation rate per embryo transferred in the first warming cycle. Secondary outcomes were survival and transfer rates, blastocyst quality after warming, clinical pregnancy rate and implantation rate per warmed blastocyst. Blastocysts were vitrified-warmed one by one using closed vitrification and one or two blastocysts were transferred per warming cycle.
We calculated that the group sample sizes of 80 embryos in the collapse group and 80 embryos in the control group were needed to achieve 80% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of +20% with P < 0.05. In the study group, 69 first warming cycles resulted in 69 transfers with 1.2 blastocysts (n = 85) transferred. In the control group, an average of 1.3 blastocysts (n = 83) were transferred in 67 out of 69 warming cycles. Implantation rates per embryo transferred in the first warming cycle were not different between both groups (38 versus 29%, OR: 1.48; 95% CI: 0.78-2.83), neither was the implantation rate per warmed embryo (38 versus 26%, OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 0.92-3.29). When all warming cycles were considered (n = 135 in each group), survival rate after collapse was significantly higher compared with the control group (98.0 versus 92.0%, OR: 4.25; 95% CI: 1.19-15.21). Furthermore, a higher percentage of high-quality blastocysts (36.3 versus 23.5%, OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.12-3.08) and hatching blastocysts (19.2 versus 5.4%, OR: 4.18; 95% CI: 1.84-9.52) were found compared with the control group.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The study lasted more than 2.5 years since fewer patients than expected returned for a warming cycle because of the high ongoing pregnancy rates in the fresh IVF/ICSI cycle.
Although no significant higher implantation rate was found after collapse, the better survival and post-warm embryo quality convinced us to recognize a clinical benefit of artificial shrinkage and to implement it in routine vitrification practice.
NCT01980225, www.clinicaltrials.gov. The first patient was included November 2011 and the study was registered October 2013.
玻璃化冷冻前通过激光诱导塌陷进行人工收缩对玻璃化-解冻囊胚移植后的着床潜力有何影响?
与未塌陷囊胚(28.9%)相比,激光诱导塌陷造成的人工收缩并未显著提高每个移植的塌陷囊胚的着床率(37.6%)[优势比(OR):1.48,95%置信区间(CI):0.78 - 2.83]。
回顾性研究表明,玻璃化冷冻前囊胚的人工收缩对解冻后的囊胚存活可能有积极影响。最近一项研究发现塌陷囊胚的存活率相似,但着床率更高。到目前为止,尚未进行随机对照试验来研究塌陷囊胚的着床潜力。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:前瞻性随机试验。从2011年12月至2014年4月招募患者,纳入的解冻周期直至2014年7月。如果有囊胚可用于玻璃化冷冻,则在新鲜周期将患者随机分组,并根据计算机生成的列表分配至研究组或对照组。在研究组中,囊胚在玻璃化冷冻前进行激光诱导塌陷。在对照组中,囊胚不进行塌陷直接玻璃化冷冻。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:共有443名患者签署了知情同意书,270名患者进行了囊胚玻璃化冷冻。135名患者被分配至研究组,135名患者被分配至对照组。研究组的69名患者和对照组的69名患者返回进行至少一个解冻周期,其中在第一个周期分别解冻了85个和93个囊胚。主要结局是第一个解冻周期中每个移植胚胎的着床率。次要结局包括存活率、移植率、解冻后囊胚质量、临床妊娠率以及每个解冻囊胚的着床率。使用封闭玻璃化冷冻法逐个对囊胚进行玻璃化-解冻,每个解冻周期移植一或两个囊胚。
我们计算得出,塌陷组和对照组各需80个胚胎的样本量,才能有80%的把握检测出两组比例相差 +20%且P < 0.05的差异。在研究组中,69个首次解冻周期导致69次移植,共移植1.2个囊胚(n = 85)。在对照组中,69个解冻周期中的67个平均移植了1.3个囊胚(n = 83)。两组在第一个解冻周期中每个移植胚胎的着床率无差异(38%对29%,OR:1.48;95% CI:0.78 - 2.83),每个解冻胚胎的着床率也无差异(38%对26%,OR:1.74;95% CI:0.92 - 3.29)。当考虑所有解冻周期时(每组n = 135),塌陷后的存活率显著高于对照组(98.0%对92.0%,OR:4.25;95% CI:1.19 - 15.21)。此外,与对照组相比,高质量囊胚(36.3%对23.5%,OR:1.86;95% CI:1.12 - 3.08)和孵化囊胚(19.2%对5.4%,OR:4.18;95% CI:1.84 - 9.52)的比例更高。
局限性、注意事项:由于新鲜体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中持续妊娠率较高,返回进行解冻周期的患者比预期少,该研究持续了超过2.5年。
尽管塌陷后未发现显著更高的着床率,但更好的存活率和解冻后胚胎质量使我们认识到人工收缩的临床益处,并将其应用于常规玻璃化冷冻实践中。
NCT01980225,www.clinicaltrials.gov。首例患者于2011年11月纳入,该研究于2013年10月注册。