Antonic Manja, Gubensek Jakob, Buturovic-Ponikvar Jadranka, Ponikvar Rafael
General Hospital Celje, Celje, Slovenia.
University Medical Center Ljubljana.
Artif Organs. 2016 Apr;40(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/aor.12559. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
In plasma exchange (PE), contrary to dialysis, there is no ultrafiltration, and the volume of anticoagulant contributes to volume overload of the patient and might also reduce PE efficiency through dilution. To reduce the volume of citrate, we compared 4 and 15% citrate anticoagulation protocols in PE in a randomized study, aiming to evaluate PE efficacy, anticoagulation efficiency, and overall safety. In addition to standard biochemical analyses during PE treatments, the elimination rate (ER) of immunoglobulins was calculated to evaluate PE efficacy. Anticoagulation was evaluated by postfilter ionized calcium, visual evaluation of the extracorporeal system, and change in the sieving coefficient (SC) during PE. Accumulation of citrate was determined by calculating the total-to-ionized calcium ratio and measuring the citrate concentration after PE. One hundred forty procedures (70 in each group) were performed in 37 patients. The mean citrate infusion rate was 197 ± 10 mL/h in the 4% and 59 ± 5.5 mL/h in the 15% groups, respectively; the total volume of infused citrate was 502 ± 77 mL versus 164 ± 52 mL (P < 0.001). ER for immunoglobulin G (0.57 ± 0.06 vs. 0.55 ± 0.1, P = 0.18), M, and A were comparable. Ionized calcium was stable during the procedures, and there were no significant side effects. Although postfilter ionized calcium was on the upper limit of the target range (0.41 ± 0.16 vs. 0.37 ± 0.14 mmol/L, P = 0.38), the visual assessment score was excellent, and even a rise in SC was observed during the procedures in both groups. The total-to-ionized calcium ratio was increased in 20 versus 22% of procedures, and citrate concentrations after PE were also similar (1306 ± 441 vs. 1263 ± 405 μmol/L). To conclude, we were unable to show superior PE efficacy in the 15% citrate group, but we significantly reduced the infused volume, which is important in patients with fluid overload. Both citrate protocols were found to provide excellent anticoagulation without significant metabolic disturbances or other side effects, confirming the safety of 15% citrate as anticoagulant during PE.
在血浆置换(PE)中,与透析不同,不存在超滤,抗凝剂的体积会导致患者容量过载,还可能通过稀释作用降低PE效率。为减少枸橼酸盐的用量,我们在一项随机研究中比较了PE中4%和15%枸橼酸盐抗凝方案,旨在评估PE疗效、抗凝效率和总体安全性。除了在PE治疗期间进行标准生化分析外,还计算了免疫球蛋白的清除率(ER)以评估PE疗效。通过滤器后离子钙、体外循环系统的视觉评估以及PE期间筛分系数(SC)的变化来评估抗凝效果。通过计算总钙与离子钙的比值并测量PE后的枸橼酸盐浓度来确定枸橼酸盐的蓄积情况。对37例患者进行了140次操作(每组70次)。4%组的平均枸橼酸盐输注速率为197±10 mL/h,15%组为59±5.5 mL/h;输注的枸橼酸盐总体积分别为502±77 mL和164±52 mL(P<0.001)。免疫球蛋白G、M和A的ER相当(0.57±0.06对0.55±0.1,P=0.18)。操作过程中离子钙稳定,无明显副作用。尽管滤器后离子钙处于目标范围的上限(0.41±0.16对0.37±0.14 mmol/L,P=0.38),但视觉评估评分良好,两组在操作过程中甚至都观察到SC升高。20%对22%的操作中总钙与离子钙的比值升高,PE后的枸橼酸盐浓度也相似(1306±441对1263±405 μmol/L)。总之,我们未能证明15%枸橼酸盐组的PE疗效更优,但我们显著减少了输注量,这对液体过载患者很重要。两种枸橼酸盐方案均显示出良好的抗凝效果,无明显代谢紊乱或其他副作用,并证实了15%枸橼酸盐作为PE抗凝剂的安全性。