DiDato Sebastian, Farber Alik, Rybin Denis, Kalish Jeffrey A, Eslami Mohammad H, Moreira Carla C, Shah Nishant K, Siracuse Jeffrey J
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.071. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
Although the effect of trainee involvement has been evaluated across different specialties, their effects on perioperative outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair have not been examined. Our goal was to examine the association between resident and fellow intraoperative participation with perioperative outcomes of endovascular AAA repair (EVAR), open infrarenal AAA repair (OIAR), and open juxtarenal AAA repair (OJAR).
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set (2005-2012) was queried to identify all patients who underwent EVAR, OIAR, or OJAR. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess the association of trainee involvement with perioperative morbidity and mortality.
We identified 16,977 patients: 12,003 with EVAR, 3655 with OIAR, and 1319 with OJAR. Propensity matching and multivariate analyses revealed that there was no significant difference in perioperative death, cardiac arrest/myocardial infarction, pulmonary, renal, venous thromboembolic, or wound complications, or return to the operating room. However, trainee involvement in AAA repair led to a significant increase in operative time for EVAR (163 ± 77 vs 140 ± 67 minutes; P < .001), OIAR (217 ± 91 vs 185 ± 76 minutes; P < .001), and OJAR (267 ± 115 vs 214 ± 106 minutes; P < .001) and an extended length of stay for EVAR (3.1 ± 5.3 vs 2.8 ± 4.5 days; P < .001) and OIAR (10.6 ± 11.8 vs 9.1 ± 8.9 days; P < .001).
Trainee participation in aneurysm repair was not associated with major adverse perioperative outcomes. However, it was associated with an increased operative time and length of stay and therefore may lead to increased resource utilization and cost.
尽管已在不同专业中评估了学员参与的效果,但尚未研究其对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后围手术期结局的影响。我们的目标是研究住院医师和专科住院医生术中参与情况与血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术(EVAR)、开放性肾下腹主动脉瘤修复术(OIAR)和开放性近肾腹主动脉瘤修复术(OJAR)围手术期结局之间的关联。
查询美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据集(2005 - 2012年),以识别所有接受EVAR、OIAR或OJAR的患者。进行多变量分析以评估学员参与与围手术期发病率和死亡率之间的关联。
我们识别出16977例患者:12003例接受EVAR,3655例接受OIAR,1319例接受OJAR。倾向匹配和多变量分析显示,围手术期死亡、心脏骤停/心肌梗死、肺部、肾脏、静脉血栓栓塞或伤口并发症,以及返回手术室方面无显著差异。然而,学员参与AAA修复导致EVAR(163±77 vs 140±67分钟;P <.001)、OIAR(217±91 vs 185±76分钟;P <.001)和OJAR(267±115 vs 214±106分钟;P <.001)的手术时间显著延长,以及EVAR(3.1±5.3 vs 2.8±4.5天;P <.001)和OIAR(10.6±11.8 vs 9.1±8.9天;P <.001)的住院时间延长。
学员参与动脉瘤修复与围手术期主要不良结局无关。然而,它与手术时间延长和住院时间延长相关,因此可能导致资源利用增加和成本上升。