Meili Marc, Müller Beat, Kulkarni Prasad, Schütz Philipp
a 1 Medical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau - Endocrinology/Diabetes/Clinical Nutrition and Internal Medicine, Aarau, CH 5000, Switzerland.
b 2 Asclepius Medical Communications LLC, Ridgewood, NJ 0750, USA.
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2015 Oct;9(5):587-601. doi: 10.1586/17476348.2015.1081063. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
Use of inflammatory biomarkers to guide antibiotic decisions has shown promising results in the risk-adapted management of respiratory tract infections, mainly in the inpatient setting. Several observational and interventional trials have investigated the benefits of procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) testing in primary care. Both markers have shown promising results, although CRP is an inflammatory biomarker while PCT is more specific for bacterial infections. For CRP, point-of-care testing is widely established. Recently, sensitive point-of-care testing for PCT has also become available. A high-quality trial comparing these two markers for the management of patients in primary care is currently lacking. The aim of this paper is to review the existing literature investigating the use of PCT and CRP in primary care. The authors compare their performance for guiding antibiotic stewardship and analyze the cut-off values and endpoints to put these parameters into context in a low-acuity environment.
在呼吸道感染的风险适应性管理中,使用炎症生物标志物来指导抗生素决策已显示出有前景的结果,主要是在住院环境中。一些观察性和干预性试验已经研究了降钙素原(PCT)和C反应蛋白(CRP)检测在初级保健中的益处。尽管CRP是一种炎症生物标志物,而PCT对细菌感染更具特异性,但这两种标志物都显示出有前景的结果。对于CRP,即时检测已广泛应用。最近,PCT的敏感即时检测也已可用。目前缺乏一项高质量试验来比较这两种标志物在初级保健中对患者的管理效果。本文的目的是综述现有文献,探讨PCT和CRP在初级保健中的应用。作者比较了它们在指导抗生素管理方面的性能,并分析了临界值和终点,以便在低急症环境中对这些参数进行背景化分析。