Narayen Ilona C, Blom Nico A, Ewer Andrew K, Vento Maximo, Manzoni Paolo, te Pas Arjan B
Department of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Mar;101(2):F162-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309205. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
Pulse oximetry (PO) screening for critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) has been studied extensively and is being increasingly implemented worldwide. This review provides an overview of all aspects of PO screening that need to be considered when introducing this methodology. PO screening for CCHD is effective, simple, quick, reliable, cost-effective and does not lead to extra burden for parents and caregivers. Test accuracy can be influenced by targets definition, gestational age, timing of screening and antenatal detection of CCHD. Early screening can lead to more false positive screenings, but has the potential to detect significant pathology earlier. There is no apparent difference in accuracy between screening with post-ductal measurements only, compared with screening using pre-ductal and post-ductal measurements. However, adding pre-ductal measurements identifies cases of CCHD which would have been missed by post-ductal screening. Screening at higher altitudes leads to more false positives. Important non-cardiac pathology is found in 35-74% of false positives in large studies. Screening is feasible in neonatal intensive care units and out-of-hospital births. Training caregivers, simplifying the algorithm and using computer-based interpretation tools can improve the quality of the screening. Caregivers need to consider all aspects of screening to enable them to choose an optimal protocol for implementation of CCHD screening in their specific setting.
针对危及生命的先天性心脏病(CCHD)的脉搏血氧饱和度(PO)筛查已得到广泛研究,并在全球范围内越来越多地得到实施。本综述概述了引入该方法时需要考虑的PO筛查的各个方面。针对CCHD的PO筛查有效、简单、快速、可靠、具有成本效益,且不会给父母和护理人员带来额外负担。检测准确性可能会受到目标定义、胎龄、筛查时间以及CCHD的产前检测的影响。早期筛查可能会导致更多假阳性筛查结果,但有潜力更早地检测出重大病变。仅使用导管后测量进行筛查与同时使用导管前和导管后测量进行筛查在准确性方面没有明显差异。然而,增加导管前测量可识别出导管后筛查会遗漏的CCHD病例。在更高海拔地区进行筛查会导致更多假阳性结果。在大型研究中,35%至74%的假阳性结果中发现了重要的非心脏病变。在新生儿重症监护病房和院外分娩中进行筛查是可行的。培训护理人员、简化算法并使用基于计算机的解读工具可以提高筛查质量。护理人员需要考虑筛查的各个方面,以便能够在其特定环境中选择实施CCHD筛查的最佳方案。