Collado-Mateo Daniel, Adsuar Jose C, Olivares Pedro R, Cano-Plasencia Ricardo, Gusi Narcis
a University of Extremadura , Cáceres , Spain .
b San Pedro de Alcántara Hospital, Clinical Neurophysiology, Avda. Universidad s/n , Cáceres , Spain , and.
Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(4):219-26. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1074566. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
BACKGROUND: The analysis of brain activity during balance is an important topic in different fields of science. Given that all measurements involve an error that is caused by different agents, like the instrument, the researcher, or the natural human variability, a test-retest reliability evaluation of the electroencephalographic assessment is a needed starting point. However, there is a lack of information about the reliability of electroencephalographic measurements, especially in a new wireless device with dry electrodes. OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to analyze the reliability of electroencephalographic measurements from a wireless device using dry electrodes during two different balance tests. METHOD: Seventeen healthy male volunteers performed two different static balance tasks on a Biodex Balance Platform: (a) with two feet on the platform and (b) with one foot on the platform. Electroencephalographic data was recorded using Enobio (Neuroelectrics). The mean power spectrum of the alpha band of the central and frontal channels was calculated. Relative and absolute indices of reliability were also calculated. RESULTS: In general terms, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of all the assessed channels can be classified as excellent (>0.90). The percentage standard error of measurement oscillated from 0.54% to 1.02% and the percentage smallest real difference ranged from 1.50% to 2.82%. CONCLUSION: Electroencephalographic assessment through an Enobio device during balance tasks has an excellent reliability. However, its utility was not demonstrated because responsiveness was not assessed.
背景:平衡过程中大脑活动的分析是不同科学领域的一个重要课题。鉴于所有测量都存在由不同因素引起的误差,如仪器、研究人员或人类自然变异性,脑电图评估的重测信度评估是一个必要的起点。然而,关于脑电图测量的可靠性信息匮乏,尤其是在新型干电极无线设备方面。 目的:本研究旨在分析使用干电极的无线设备在两种不同平衡测试期间脑电图测量的可靠性。 方法:17名健康男性志愿者在Biodex平衡平台上执行两项不同的静态平衡任务:(a)双脚站在平台上;(b)单脚站在平台上。使用Enobio(Neuroelectrics)记录脑电图数据。计算中央和额叶通道α波段的平均功率谱。还计算了可靠性的相对和绝对指标。 结果:总体而言,所有评估通道的组内相关系数(ICC)值可归类为优秀(>0.90)。测量的百分比标准误差在0.54%至1.02%之间波动,最小真实差异百分比在1.50%至2.82%之间。 结论:在平衡任务期间通过Enobio设备进行的脑电图评估具有出色的可靠性。然而,由于未评估反应性,其效用未得到证明。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003-6-27
Brain Topogr. 2017-7
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020-7
Biology (Basel). 2022-10-22
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019-12-19
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019-5