Suppr超能文献

在长期记忆中,脆弱的联想与关于精确细节的牢固记忆并存。

Fragile associations coexist with robust memories for precise details in long-term memory.

作者信息

Lew Timothy F, Pashler Harold E, Vul Edward

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):379-93. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000178. Epub 2015 Sep 14.

Abstract

What happens to memories as we forget? They might gradually lose fidelity, lose their associations (and thus be retrieved in response to the incorrect cues), or be completely lost. Typical long-term memory studies assess memory as a binary outcome (correct/incorrect), and cannot distinguish these different kinds of forgetting. Here we assess long-term memory for scalar information, thus allowing us to quantify how different sources of error diminish as we learn, and accumulate as we forget. We trained subjects on visual and verbal continuous quantities (the locations of objects and the distances between major cities, respectively), tested subjects after extended delays, and estimated whether recall errors arose due to imprecise estimates, misassociations, or complete forgetting. Although subjects quickly formed precise memories and retained them for a long time, they were slow to learn correct associations and quick to forget them. These results suggest that long-term recall is especially limited in its ability to form and retain associations.

摘要

当我们遗忘时,记忆会发生什么?它们可能会逐渐失去保真度,失去其关联性(从而在错误线索的提示下被检索出来),或者完全消失。典型的长期记忆研究将记忆评估为二元结果(正确/错误),无法区分这些不同类型的遗忘。在这里,我们评估了标量信息的长期记忆,从而使我们能够量化随着学习不同的错误来源是如何减少的,以及随着遗忘又是如何累积的。我们分别就视觉和语言连续量(物体的位置和主要城市之间的距离)对受试者进行训练,在长时间延迟后对受试者进行测试,并估计回忆错误是由于不精确的估计、错误关联还是完全遗忘而产生的。尽管受试者很快形成了精确的记忆并长时间保持,但他们学习正确关联的速度较慢,且很快就会忘记这些关联。这些结果表明,长期回忆在形成和保持关联的能力方面尤其有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验