• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通往长期记忆的道路:自上而下的注意力比对刺激的自下而上的注意更有利于形成长期记忆。

The road to long-term memory: Top-down attention is more effective than bottom-up attention for forming long-term memories.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):937-945. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01856-y. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-020-01856-y
PMID:33443709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8219582/
Abstract

Does the strength of representations in long-term memory (LTM) depend on which type of attention is engaged? We tested participants' memory for objects seen during visual search. We compared implicit memory for two types of objects-related-context nontargets that grabbed attention because they matched the target defining feature (i.e., color; top-down attention) and salient distractors that captured attention only because they were perceptually distracting (bottom-up attention). In Experiment 1, the salient distractor flickered, while in Experiment 2, the luminance of the salient distractor was alternated. Critically, salient and related-context nontargets produced equivalent attentional capture, yet related-context nontargets were remembered far better than salient distractors (and salient distractors were not remembered better than unrelated distractors). These results suggest that LTM depends not only on the amount of attention but also on the type of attention. Specifically, top-down attention is more effective in promoting the formation of memory traces than bottom-up attention.

摘要

长期记忆(LTM)中的表象强度是否取决于所涉及的注意类型?我们测试了参与者对在视觉搜索中看到的物体的记忆。我们比较了两种与物体相关的上下文非目标的内隐记忆,这些非目标之所以能引起注意,是因为它们与目标的定义特征(即颜色)相匹配(自上而下的注意),而引人注意的分散注意力的干扰物则只是因为它们在感知上有干扰性(自下而上的注意)。在实验 1 中,引人注意的干扰物闪烁,而在实验 2 中,引人注意的干扰物的亮度交替变化。关键是,引人注意的和与上下文相关的非目标产生了等效的注意捕获,但与上下文相关的非目标比引人注意的干扰物记忆得好得多(而引人注意的干扰物记忆得并不比不相关的干扰物好)。这些结果表明,LTM 不仅取决于注意力的数量,还取决于注意的类型。具体来说,自上而下的注意比自下而上的注意更有效地促进记忆痕迹的形成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/8a12e97a2846/13423_2020_1856_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/ef0934c8959f/13423_2020_1856_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/aaf92e216de8/13423_2020_1856_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/8a12e97a2846/13423_2020_1856_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/ef0934c8959f/13423_2020_1856_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/aaf92e216de8/13423_2020_1856_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a229/8219582/8a12e97a2846/13423_2020_1856_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The road to long-term memory: Top-down attention is more effective than bottom-up attention for forming long-term memories.通往长期记忆的道路:自上而下的注意力比对刺激的自下而上的注意更有利于形成长期记忆。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):937-945. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01856-y. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
2
Long-term memory for distractors: Effects of involuntary attention from working memory.长时记忆中的干扰项:来自工作记忆的非自愿注意的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Feb;52(2):401-416. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01469-5. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P with Small Search Displays.上下文元素捕获而非注意抑制干扰物,解释了小搜索显示中的 P。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jun;32(6):1170-1183. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01535. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.自上而下的聚焦空间注意在预注意显著性编码和基于显著性的注意捕获中的作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Aug;28(8):1152-65. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00964. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
5
No role for activated long-term memory in attentional control settings.在注意控制环境中,激活的长期记忆没有作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Feb;149(2):209-221. doi: 10.1037/xge0000642. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
6
Long-term visual associations affect attentional guidance.长期视觉关联影响注意力引导。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jun;137(2):243-7. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
7
Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?我们是否能更好地记住模板,从而更好地排除干扰项?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):269-279. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01721-8.
8
Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.无关特征的自上而下的非自主控制:视觉工作记忆以基于对象的方式影响注意力。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.002. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.刺激前活动预测自上而下与自下而上注意选择的获胜者。
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e16243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016243.
10
Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.显著颜色单一干扰项引起的注意捕获受自上而下的维度集调节。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Attention to memory content enhances single-unit spike sequence fidelity in the human anterior temporal lobe.对记忆内容的关注可提高人类颞叶前部单个神经元的放电序列保真度。
Curr Biol. 2025 Mar 10;35(5):1085-1094.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.048. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Goal-directed attention transforms both working and long-term memory representations in the human parietal cortex.目标导向注意力在人类顶叶皮层中转换工作记忆和长时记忆的表征。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jul 15;22(7):e3002721. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002721. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
The effects of viewing by scrolling on a small screen on the encoding of objects into visual long-term memory.

本文引用的文献

1
Time-dependent forgetting and retrieval practice effects in detailed visual long-term memory.精细视觉长期记忆中的时间依赖性遗忘和检索练习效应
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jun;72(6):1561-1577. doi: 10.1177/1747021818799697. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Intention, attention and long-term memory for visual scenes: It all depends on the scenes.意图、注意力和视觉场景的长期记忆:这完全取决于场景。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:24-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention.因持续性注意力不集中而遗忘。
在小屏幕上滚动查看对物体编码进入视觉长期记忆的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1191952. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191952. eCollection 2023.
4
Meaningful objects avoid attribute amnesia due to incidental long-term memories.有意义的物体可以避免由于偶然的长期记忆而导致的属性遗忘。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 2;13(1):14464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41642-z.
5
Speakers of different languages remember visual scenes differently.不同语言的使用者对视觉场景的记忆方式不同。
Sci Adv. 2023 Aug 18;9(33):eadh0064. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adh0064. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):605-611. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5.
4
Prolonged focal attention without binding: Tracking a ball for half a minute without remembering its color.无关联的长时间集中注意力:追踪一个球半分钟而不记住其颜色。
Cognition. 2016 Feb;147:144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.014. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Fragile associations coexist with robust memories for precise details in long-term memory.在长期记忆中,脆弱的联想与关于精确细节的牢固记忆并存。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Mar;42(3):379-93. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000178. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Amnesia for object attributes: failure to report attended information that had just reached conscious awareness.对物体属性的失忆:无法报告刚进入意识觉知的被注意到的信息。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Feb;26(2):203-10. doi: 10.1177/0956797614560648. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
7
Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.线索化视觉记忆对注意引导的快速影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:1-10. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12574. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent.自下而上的注意力和自上而下的注意力是相互独立的。
J Vis. 2013 Jul 17;13(3):16. doi: 10.1167/13.3.16.
9
Attentional load and attentional boost: a review of data and theory.注意负荷和注意提升:数据和理论综述。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 20;4:274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00274. eCollection 2013.
10
Visual long-term memory has the same limit on fidelity as visual working memory.视觉长期记忆在保真度上与视觉工作记忆相同。
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jun;24(6):981-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797612465439. Epub 2013 Apr 29.