Falb Kathryn L, Annan Jeannie, Kpebo Denise, Cole Heather, Willie Tiara, Xuan Ziming, Raj Anita, Gupta Jhumka
International Rescue Committee, Research, Evaluation, and Learning, New York, New York; Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
International Rescue Committee, Research, Evaluation, and Learning, New York, New York; FXB Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Nov;57(5):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
Little is known about whether effectiveness of intimate partner violence prevention programming varies for women who were married as child brides, given their additional social vulnerabilities. This subanalysis sought to assess treatment heterogeneity based on child marriage status for an intervention seeking to reduce intimate partner violence.
A randomized controlled trial assessing the incremental effectiveness of gender dialogue groups in addition to group savings on changing past-year intimate partner violence was conducted in Côte d'Ivoire (2010-2012). Stratified models were constructed based on child marriage status to assess for effect modification. Analysis was restricted to married women with data on age at marriage (n = 682).
For child brides (N = 202), there were no statistically or marginally significant decreases in physical and/or sexual violence, physical violence, or sexual violence. The odds of reporting economic abuse in the past year were lower in the intervention arm for child brides relative to control group child brides (odds ratio [OR] = .33; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .13-.85; p = .02). For nonchild brides (N = 480), women were less likely to report physical and/or sexual violence (OR = .54; 95% CI = .28-1.04; p = .06), emotional violence (OR = .44; 95% CI = .25-.77; p = .004), and economic abuse (OR = .36; 95% CI = .20-.66; p = .001) in the combined intervention arm than their group savings-only counterparts.
Findings suggest that intervention participants with a history of child marriage may have greater difficulty benefiting from interventions that seek to reduce intimate partner violence.
鉴于早婚女性存在额外的社会脆弱性,对于预防亲密伴侣暴力的项目成效在这类女性中是否存在差异,目前所知甚少。本亚组分析旨在基于早婚状况评估一项旨在减少亲密伴侣暴力的干预措施的治疗异质性。
在科特迪瓦(2010 - 2012年)开展了一项随机对照试验,评估性别对话小组以及小组储蓄在改变过去一年亲密伴侣暴力方面的增量成效。基于早婚状况构建分层模型以评估效应修正。分析仅限于有初婚年龄数据的已婚女性(n = 682)。
对于早婚女性(N = 202),身体暴力和/或性暴力、身体暴力或性暴力在统计学上或边缘显著水平上均无下降。与对照组早婚女性相比,干预组早婚女性在过去一年报告经济虐待的几率更低(优势比[OR] = 0.33;95%置信区间[CI] = 0.13 - 0.85;p = 0.02)。对于非早婚女性(N = 480),与仅参与小组储蓄的女性相比,综合干预组的女性报告身体暴力和/或性暴力(OR = 0.54;95% CI = 0.28 - 1.04;p = 0.06)、情感暴力(OR = 0.44;95% CI = 0.25 - 0.77;p = 0.004)和经济虐待(OR = 0.36;95% CI = 0.20 - 0.66;p = 0.001)的可能性更低。
研究结果表明,有早婚史的干预参与者可能更难从旨在减少亲密伴侣暴力的干预措施中获益。