• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用自动装置绕过牙胶根管充填物。

Bypassing gutta-percha root fillings with an automated device.

作者信息

Friedman S, Rotstein I, Shar-Lev S

出版信息

J Endod. 1989 Sep;15(9):432-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80178-5.

DOI:10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80178-5
PMID:2637337
Abstract

Endodontic retreatment using Canal Finder K files and chloroform was performed in 106 gutta-percha-obturated, curved root canals, 71 in vitro and 35 in vivo. The minimum time taken to bypass the obturation in a single root canal was 3 s and the maximum time 95 s. The mean times were 19 and 27 s in the two in vitro groups and 32 s in the in vivo group. Eighty-nine percent of the root canals which had been obturated short were bypassed apically in vivo. Root canal curvature was well maintained in all but two root canals. In these two cases apical transportation occurred. Breakage of files occurred three times in vitro, but this did not prevent the completion of bypassing with new files. These results are attributed to the mode of action of the Canal Finder system, which makes it an efficient root canal pathfinder. The advantages of the suggested technique are discussed in light of the clinical considerations of endodontic retreatment.

摘要

使用根管探查K锉和氯仿对106个牙胶尖充填的弯曲根管进行根管再治疗,其中71个在体外,35个在体内。在单个根管中绕过充填物所需的最短时间为3秒,最长时间为95秒。两个体外组的平均时间分别为19秒和27秒,体内组为32秒。在体内,89%充填过短的根管在根尖部被绕过。除两个根管外,所有根管的根管弯曲度均保持良好。在这两个病例中发生了根尖移位。锉在体外折断了三次,但这并未妨碍用新锉完成绕过操作。这些结果归因于根管探查系统的作用方式,这使其成为一种有效的根管探路器。根据根管再治疗的临床考虑因素,讨论了所建议技术的优点。

相似文献

1
Bypassing gutta-percha root fillings with an automated device.使用自动装置绕过牙胶根管充填物。
J Endod. 1989 Sep;15(9):432-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80178-5.
2
Thermafil retreatment with and without chloroform solvent.使用和不使用氯仿溶剂的热牙胶再治疗
J Endod. 1993 Nov;19(11):563-6. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81287-2.
3
Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer.H锉和旋转镍钛器械去除牙胶和四种根管封闭剂效果的体外研究
Int Endod J. 2006 Jan;39(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.01046.x.
4
Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.椭圆形根管中手动与自动器械再治疗效果的体外研究
Int Endod J. 2006 Jul;39(7):521-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01100.x.
5
An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals.对用于充填0.06锥度预备的弯曲根管的0.06锥度牙胶尖的评估。
Int Endod J. 2005 Feb;38(2):87-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00903.x.
6
Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment.
Braz Dent J. 2001;12(2):95-9.
7
Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.HERO 642与Hedström锉在去除弯曲根管中牙胶充填物方面的有效性:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2009 Nov;42(11):1050-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01624.x.
8
Accuracy of two root canal length measurement devices integrated into rotary endodontic motors when removing gutta-percha from root-filled teeth.从根管充填牙中去除牙胶时,集成于旋转式牙髓治疗机的两种根管长度测量装置的准确性。
Int Endod J. 2008 Sep;41(9):725-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01416.x. Epub 2008 Jul 14.
9
Comparative study of removal of current endodontic fillings.当前牙髓充填物去除的比较研究
J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):326-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.12.022.
10
Endodontic retreatment of Thermafil versus laterally condensed gutta-percha.
J Endod. 1994 Mar;20(3):115-7. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80054-3.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative evaluation of two rotary Ni-Ti instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during retreatment.两种旋转镍钛器械在根管再治疗时去除牙胶的比较评价
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Aug;6(Suppl 2):S131-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.189740.
2
Comparison of Time Required by D-RaCe, R-Endo and Mtwo Instruments for Retreatment: An in vitro Study.D-RaCe、R-Endo和Mtwo器械进行再治疗所需时间的比较:一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Feb;9(2):ZC47-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11100.5596. Epub 2015 Feb 1.
3
Evaluation of manual and two-rotary niti retreatment systems in removing gutta-percha obturated with two root canal sealers.
手动和双旋转镍钛再治疗系统去除用两种根管封闭剂充填的牙胶的效果评估
ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:208241. doi: 10.5402/2012/208241. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
4
Comparative SEM evaluation of three solvents used in endodontic retreatment: an ex vivo study.三种用于根管再治疗的溶剂的扫描电子显微镜比较评估:一项体外研究。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):24-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100006.