Brewer Rebecca, Marsh Abigail A, Catmur Caroline, Cardinale Elise M, Stoycos Sarah, Cook Richard, Bird Geoffrey
MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre.
Department of Psychology, Georgetown University.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 Aug;124(3):589-95. doi: 10.1037/abn0000076.
One's own emotional response toward a hypothetical action can influence judgments of its moral acceptability. Some individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) exhibit atypical emotional processing, and moral judgments. Research suggests, however, that emotional deficits in ASD are due to co-occurring alexithymia, meaning atypical moral judgments in ASD may be due to alexithymia also. Individuals with and without ASD (matched for alexithymia) judged the moral acceptability of emotion-evoking statements and identified the emotion evoked. Moral acceptability judgments were predicted by alexithymia. Crucially, however, this relationship held only for individuals without ASD. While ASD diagnostic status did not directly predict either judgment, those with ASD did not base their moral acceptability judgments on emotional information. Findings are consistent with evidence demonstrating that decision-making is less subject to emotional biases in those with ASD.
一个人对假设行为的自身情绪反应会影响对其道德可接受性的判断。一些患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的个体表现出非典型的情绪处理和道德判断。然而,研究表明,ASD中的情绪缺陷是由于同时存在述情障碍,这意味着ASD中不典型的道德判断也可能归因于述情障碍。有和没有ASD的个体(在述情障碍方面进行匹配)对引发情绪的陈述的道德可接受性进行了判断,并识别出所引发的情绪。述情障碍可预测道德可接受性判断。然而,至关重要的是,这种关系仅适用于没有ASD的个体。虽然ASD诊断状态并不能直接预测任何一种判断,但患有ASD的个体在进行道德可接受性判断时并非基于情绪信息。这些发现与证据一致,这些证据表明ASD患者在决策时较少受到情绪偏见的影响。