用于肝性脑病患者的支链氨基酸。

Branched-chain amino acids for people with hepatic encephalopathy.

作者信息

Gluud Lise Lotte, Dam Gitte, Les Iñigo, Córdoba Juan, Marchesini Giulio, Borre Mette, Aagaard Niels Kristian, Vilstrup Hendrik

机构信息

Gastrounit, Medical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegaards Alle, Hvidovre, Denmark, 2650.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 17(9):CD001939. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001939.pub3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy is a brain dysfunction with neurological and psychiatric changes associated with liver insufficiency or portal-systemic shunting. The severity ranges from minor symptoms to coma. A Cochrane systematic review including 11 randomised clinical trials on branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) versus control interventions has evaluated if BCAA may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of BCAA versus any control intervention for people with hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified trials through manual and electronic searches in The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index (August 2015).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials, irrespective of the bias control, language, or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The authors independently extracted data based on published reports and collected data from the primary investigators. We changed our primary outcomes in this update of the review to include mortality (all cause), hepatic encephalopathy (number of people without improved manifestations of hepatic encephalopathy), and adverse events. The analyses included random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses. We performed subgroup, sensitivity, regression, and trial sequential analyses to evaluate sources of heterogeneity (including intervention, and participant and trial characteristics), bias (using The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group method), small-study effects, and the robustness of the results after adjusting for sparse data and multiplicity. We graded the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 16 randomised clinical trials including 827 participants with hepatic encephalopathy classed as overt (12 trials) or minimal (four trials). Eight trials assessed oral BCAA supplements and seven trials assessed intravenous BCAA. The control groups received placebo/no intervention (two trials), diets (10 trials), lactulose (two trials), or neomycin (two trials). In 15 trials, all participants had cirrhosis. We classed seven trials as low risk of bias and nine trials as high risk of bias (mainly due to lack of blinding or for-profit funding). In a random-effects meta-analysis of mortality, we found no difference between BCAA and controls (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 1.11; 760 participants; 15 trials; moderate quality of evidence). We found no evidence of small-study effects. Sensitivity analyses of trials with a low risk of bias found no beneficial or detrimental effect of BCAA on mortality. Trial sequential analysis showed that the required information size was not reached, suggesting that additional evidence was needed. BCAA had a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.88; 827 participants; 16 trials; high quality of evidence). We found no small-study effects and confirmed the beneficial effect of BCAA in a sensitivity analysis that only included trials with a low risk of bias (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.96). The trial sequential analysis showed that firm evidence was reached. In a fixed-effect meta-analysis, we found that BCAA increased the risk of nausea and vomiting (RR 5.56; 2.93 to 10.55; moderate quality of evidence). We found no beneficial or detrimental effects of BCAA on nausea or vomiting in a random-effects meta-analysis or on quality of life or nutritional parameters. We did not identify predictors of the intervention effect in the subgroup, sensitivity, or meta-regression analyses. In sensitivity analyses that excluded trials with a lactulose or neomycin control, BCAA had a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.92). Additional sensitivity analyses found no difference between BCAA and lactulose or neomycin (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.34 to 1.30).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In this updated review, we included five additional trials. The analyses showed that BCAA had a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy. We found no effect on mortality, quality of life, or nutritional parameters, but we need additional trials to evaluate these outcomes. Likewise, we need additional randomised clinical trials to determine the effect of BCAA compared with interventions such as non-absorbable disaccharides, rifaximin, or other antibiotics.

摘要

背景

肝性脑病是一种与肝功能不全或门体分流相关的伴有神经和精神改变的脑功能障碍。其严重程度从轻微症状到昏迷不等。一项Cochrane系统评价纳入了11项关于支链氨基酸(BCAA)与对照干预措施的随机临床试验,评估了BCAA是否对肝性脑病患者有益。

目的

评估BCAA与任何对照干预措施对肝性脑病患者的有益和有害影响。

检索方法

我们通过手工检索和电子检索在Cochrane肝胆组对照试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和科学引文索引(2015年8月)中识别试验。

选择标准

我们纳入随机临床试验,不论其偏倚控制、语言或发表状态如何。

数据收集与分析

作者根据已发表报告独立提取数据,并从主要研究者处收集数据。在本次系统评价更新中,我们将主要结局改为包括死亡率(全因)、肝性脑病(肝性脑病表现未改善的人数)和不良事件。分析包括随机效应和固定效应荟萃分析。我们进行亚组分析、敏感性分析、回归分析和试验序贯分析,以评估异质性来源(包括干预措施、参与者和试验特征)、偏倚(使用Cochrane肝胆组方法)、小研究效应以及在调整稀疏数据和多重性后结果的稳健性。我们使用GRADE方法对证据质量进行分级。

主要结果

我们发现16项随机临床试验,包括827例肝性脑病患者,分为显性(12项试验)或轻微型(4项试验)。8项试验评估口服BCAA补充剂,7项试验评估静脉注射BCAA。对照组接受安慰剂/无干预(2项试验)、饮食(10项试验)、乳果糖(2项试验)或新霉素(2项试验)。在15项试验中,所有参与者均患有肝硬化。我们将7项试验归类为低偏倚风险,9项试验归类为高偏倚风险(主要由于缺乏盲法或营利性资助)。在死亡率的随机效应荟萃分析中,我们发现BCAA与对照组之间无差异(风险比(RR)0.88,95%置信区间(CI)0.69至1.11;760名参与者;15项试验;中等质量证据)。我们未发现小研究效应。对低偏倚风险试验的敏感性分析发现,BCAA对死亡率无有益或有害影响。试验序贯分析表明未达到所需信息规模,提示需要更多证据。BCAA对肝性脑病有有益作用(RR 0.73,95%CI 0.61至0.88;827名参与者;16项试验;高质量证据)。我们未发现小研究效应,并在仅纳入低偏倚风险试验的敏感性分析中证实了BCAA的有益作用(RR 0.71,95%CI 0.52至0.96)。试验序贯分析表明已获得确凿证据。在固定效应荟萃分析中,我们发现BCAA增加了恶心和呕吐的风险(RR 5.56;2.93至10.55;中等质量证据)。在随机效应荟萃分析中,我们未发现BCAA对恶心或呕吐、生活质量或营养参数有有益或有害影响。在亚组分析、敏感性分析或荟萃回归分析中,我们未确定干预效果的预测因素。在排除以乳果糖或新霉素为对照的试验的敏感性分析中,BCAA对肝性脑病有有益作用(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.63至0.92)。其他敏感性分析发现BCAA与乳果糖或新霉素之间无差异(RR 0.66,95%CI 0.34至1.30)。

作者结论

在本次更新的系统评价中,我们额外纳入了5项试验。分析表明,BCAA对肝性脑病有有益作用。我们未发现其对死亡率、生活质量或营养参数有影响,但我们需要更多试验来评估这些结局。同样,我们需要更多随机临床试验来确定BCAA与不可吸收双糖、利福昔明或其他抗生素等干预措施相比的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索