Goh Ee Teng, Andersen Mette L, Morgan Marsha Y, Gluud Lise Lotte
UCL Institute for Liver & Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, Rowland Hill Street, Hampstead, London, UK, NW3 2PF.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 10;8(8):CD002798. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002798.pub4.
Hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication of cirrhosis which results in poor brain functioning. The spectrum of changes associated with hepatic encephalopathy ranges from the clinically 'indiscernible' or minimal hepatic encephalopathy to the clinically 'obvious' or overt hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is a synthetic benzodiazepine antagonist with high affinity for the central benzodiazepine recognition site. Flumazenil may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy through an indirect negative allosteric modulatory effect on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function. The previous version of this review, which included 13 randomised clinical trials, found no effect of flumazenil on all-cause mortality, based on an analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials, but found a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, based on an analysis of eight randomised clinical trials.
To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.
We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS; meeting and conference proceedings; and bibliographies in May 2017.
We included randomised clinical trials regardless of publication status, blinding, or language in the analyses of benefits and harms, and observational studies in the assessment of harms.
Two review authors extracted data independently. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains; determined the quality of the evidence using GRADE; evaluated the risk of small-study effects in regression analyses; and conducted trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.
We identified 14 eligible randomised clinical trials with 867 participants, the majority of whom had an acute episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, we identified one ongoing randomised clinical trial. We were unable to gather outcome data from two randomised clinical trials with 25 participants. Thus, our analyses include 842 participants from 12 randomised clinical trials comparing flumazenil versus placebo. We classified one randomised clinical trial at low risk of bias in the overall assessment and the remaining randomised clinical trials at high risk of bias. The duration of follow-up ranged from a few minutes to two weeks, but it was less than one day in the majority of the trials.In total, 32/433 (7.4%) participants allocated to flumazenil versus 38/409 (9.3%) participants allocated to placebo died (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 11 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis and the one randomised clinical trial assessed as low risk of bias (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.53) found no beneficial or harmful effects of flumazenil on all-cause mortality. The methods used to evaluate hepatic encephalopathy included several different clinical scales, electrophysiological variables, and psychometric tests. Flumazenil was associated with a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy when including all randomised clinical trials (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80; 824 participants; nine randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence), or just the trial at low risk of bias (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84; 527 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis supported a beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy. The randomised clinical trials included little information about causes of death and little information on non-fatal serious adverse events.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found low quality evidence suggesting a short-term beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis, but no evidence of an effect on all-cause mortality. Additional evidence from large, high quality randomised clinical trials is needed to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of flumazenil in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.
肝性脑病是肝硬化的常见并发症,可导致脑功能受损。与肝性脑病相关的变化范围从临床上“难以察觉”的轻微肝性脑病到临床上“明显”的显性肝性脑病。氟马西尼是一种合成的苯二氮䓬拮抗剂,对中枢苯二氮䓬识别位点具有高亲和力。氟马西尼可能通过对γ-氨基丁酸受体功能的间接负变构调节作用,使肝性脑病患者受益。本综述的上一版本纳入了13项随机临床试验,基于对10项随机临床试验的分析,发现氟马西尼对全因死亡率无影响,但基于对8项随机临床试验的分析,发现其对肝性脑病有有益作用。
评估氟马西尼与安慰剂或不干预相比,对肝硬化合并肝性脑病患者的有益和有害影响。
我们检索了Cochrane肝胆疾病组对照试验注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库、Embase数据库、科学引文索引扩展版和拉丁美洲及加勒比地区卫生科学数据库;会议论文集;以及2017年5月的参考文献。
在分析益处和危害时,我们纳入了无论发表状态、盲法或语言的随机临床试验,并在评估危害时纳入了观察性研究。
两位综述作者独立提取数据。我们进行了荟萃分析,并使用风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)呈现结果,并用I²值作为异质性的指标。我们使用Cochrane肝胆疾病组领域评估偏倚控制;使用GRADE确定证据质量;在回归分析中评估小样本研究效应的风险;并进行试验序贯、亚组和敏感性分析。
我们确定了14项符合条件的随机临床试验,共867名参与者,其中大多数患有显性肝性脑病急性发作。此外,我们确定了一项正在进行的随机临床试验。我们无法从两项共25名参与者的随机临床试验中收集结局数据。因此,我们的分析包括来自12项比较氟马西尼与安慰剂的随机临床试验的842名参与者。在总体评估中,我们将一项随机临床试验分类为低偏倚风险,其余随机临床试验为高偏倚风险。随访时间从几分钟到两周不等,但大多数试验少于一天。总体而言,分配至氟马西尼组的32/433名(7.4%)参与者与分配至安慰剂组的38/409名(9.3%)参与者死亡(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.48至1.16;11项随机临床试验;低质量证据)。试验序贯分析和一项被评估为低偏倚风险的随机临床试验(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.37至1.53)发现氟马西尼对全因死亡率无有益或有害影响。用于评估肝性脑病的方法包括几种不同的临床量表、电生理变量和心理测量测试。当纳入所有随机临床试验时,氟马西尼对肝性脑病有有益作用(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.71至0.80;824名参与者;9项随机临床试验;低质量证据),或者仅纳入低偏倚风险的试验(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.72至0.84;527名参与者)。试验序贯分析支持氟马西尼对肝性脑病有有益作用。随机临床试验中关于死亡原因的信息很少,关于非致命严重不良事件的信息也很少。
我们发现低质量证据表明氟马西尼对肝硬化患者的肝性脑病有短期有益作用,但没有证据表明其对全因死亡率有影响。需要来自大型、高质量随机临床试验的更多证据来评估氟马西尼对肝硬化合并肝性脑病患者的潜在益处和危害。