Tran Bach Xuan, Nguyen Long Hoang, Phan Huong Thu Thi, Nguyen Linh Khanh, Latkin Carl A
Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2015 Sep 17;12:29. doi: 10.1186/s12954-015-0063-0.
Integrating and decentralizing services are essential to increase the accessibility and provide comprehensive care for methadone patients. Moreover, they assure the sustainability of a HIV/AIDS prevention program by reducing the implementation cost. This study aimed to measure the preference of patients enrolling in a MMT program for integrated and decentralized MMT clinics and then further examine related factors.
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 510 patients receiving methadone at 3 clinics in Hanoi. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data about the preference for integrated and decentralized MMT services. Covariates including socio-economic status; health-related quality of life (using EQ-5D-5 L instrument) and HIV status; history of drug use along with MMT treatment; and exposure to the discrimination within family and community were also investigated. Multivariate logistic regression with polynomial fractions was used to identify the determinants of preference for integrative and decentralized models.
Of 510 patients enrolled, 66.7 and 60.8 % preferred integrated and decentralized models, respectively. The main reason for preferring the integrative model was the convenience of use of various services (53.2 %), while more privacy (43.5 %) was the primary reason to select stand-alone model. People preferred the decentralized model primarily because of travel cost reduction (95.0 %), while the main reason for not selecting the model was increased privacy (7.7 %). After adjusting for covariates, factors influencing the preference for integrative model were poor socioeconomic status, anxiety/depression, history of drug rehabilitation, and ever disclosed health status; while exposure to community discrimination inversely associated with this preference. In addition, people who were self-employed, had a longer duration of MMT, and use current MMT with comprehensive HIV services were less likely to select decentralized model.
In conclusion, the study confirmed the high preference of MMT patients for the integrative and decentralized MMT service delivery models. The convenience of healthcare services utilization and reduction of geographical barriers were the main reasons to use those models within drug use populations in Vietnam. Countering community stigma and encouraging communication between patients and their societies needed to be considered when implementing those models.
整合与分散服务对于提高美沙酮患者的可及性并提供全面护理至关重要。此外,它们通过降低实施成本确保了艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防项目的可持续性。本研究旨在衡量参加美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)项目的患者对整合型和分散型MMT诊所的偏好,然后进一步探究相关因素。
在河内的3家诊所对510名接受美沙酮治疗的患者进行了一项横断面研究。使用结构化问卷收集有关整合型和分散型MMT服务偏好的数据。还调查了协变量,包括社会经济状况;健康相关生活质量(使用EQ - 5D - 5L工具)和艾滋病毒状况;吸毒史以及MMT治疗情况;以及在家庭和社区中遭受歧视的情况。使用多项式分数的多变量逻辑回归来确定对整合型和分散型模式偏好的决定因素。
在510名登记患者中,分别有66.7%和60.8%的患者更喜欢整合型和分散型模式。更喜欢整合型模式的主要原因是使用各种服务方便(53.2%),而更多隐私(43.5%)是选择独立型模式的主要原因。人们主要因为降低交通成本(95.0%)而更喜欢分散型模式,而不选择该模式的主要原因是隐私性降低(7.7%)。在对协变量进行调整后,影响对整合型模式偏好的因素包括社会经济地位差、焦虑/抑郁、戒毒史以及曾披露健康状况;而遭受社区歧视与这种偏好呈负相关。此外,个体经营者、MMT治疗时间较长以及使用当前MMT并接受全面艾滋病毒服务的人选择分散型模式的可能性较小。
总之,该研究证实了MMT患者对整合型和分散型MMT服务提供模式的高度偏好。医疗服务利用的便利性和地理障碍的减少是越南吸毒人群使用这些模式的主要原因。在实施这些模式时,需要考虑消除社区耻辱感并鼓励患者与其社会之间的沟通。