Wong Yee Chi Peggy, Pang Mei Che Samantha
Yee Chi Peggy Wong, Dietetic Department, Tuen Mun Hospital, Tuen Mun, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
World J Diabetes. 2015 Sep 10;6(11):1198-206. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v6.i11.1198.
To initially test for the content validity, comprehensibility, test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability of the Yin-Yang Assessment Questionnaire (YY-AQ).
The process of initial validity and reliability test covered: (1) content validation from the findings of 18 multiple-case studies, validated Yin- and Yang-deficiency assessment questionnaires, relevant literatures and registered Chinese medicine practitioners; (2) comprehension with the levels of comprehensibility for each item categorized on a 3-point scale (not comprehensible; moderately comprehensible; highly comprehensible). A minimum of three respondents selecting for each item of moderately or highly comprehensible were regarded as comprehensive; (3) test-retest reliability conducted with a 2-wk interval. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95%CIs were calculated using a two-way random effects model. Wilcoxon Signed Rank test for related samples was adopted to compare the medians of test-retest scores. An ICC value of 0.85 or higher together with P > 0.05, was considered acceptable; and (4) internal consistency of the total items was measured and evaluated by Cronbach's coefficient alpha (α). A Cronbach's α of 0.7 or higher was considered to represent good internal consistency.
Eighteen Yin-deficiency and 14 Yang-deficiency presentation items were finalized from content validation. Five participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) performed the comprehensibility and test-retest reliability tests. Comprehensibility score level of each presentation item was found to be moderate or high in three out of the five participants. Test-retest reliability showed that the single measure ICC of the total Yin-deficiency presentation items was 0.99 (95%CI: 0.89-0.99) and the median scores on the first and 14(th) days were 17 (IQR 6.5-27) and 21 (IQR 6-29) (P = 0.144) respectively. The single measure ICC of the total Yang-deficiency presentation items was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.79-0.99) and the median scores on the first and 14(th) days were 10 (IQR 6-18) and 14 (IQR 7-23) (P = 0.144) respectively. The results of a descriptive correlation study on 140 survey participants with T2DM using the YY-AQ showed that internal consistency of the total Yin-deficiency and Yang-deficiency presentation items was satisfactory, with Cronbach's α of 0.79 and 0.78 respectively.
The YY-AQ will be tested further for comprehensibility, test-retest and internal consistency reliabilities, scoring system validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validities, responsiveness and predictive validity.
初步检验阴阳评估问卷(YY - AQ)的内容效度、可理解性、重测信度和内部一致性信度。
初始效度和信度测试过程包括:(1)通过18项多案例研究、已验证的阴阳虚证评估问卷、相关文献及注册中医师的研究结果进行内容效度验证;(2)以3分制对每个项目的可理解程度进行分类(不可理解;中等可理解;高度可理解)来评估可理解性。每个项目至少有三名受访者选择中等或高度可理解则视为具有全面性;(3)间隔2周进行重测信度测试。使用双向随机效应模型计算组内相关系数(ICC)及其95%置信区间。采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验对相关样本的重测分数中位数进行比较。ICC值≥0.85且P>0.05被认为是可接受的;(4)通过Cronbach's系数α(α)测量和评估所有项目的内部一致性。Cronbach'sα≥0.7被认为代表良好的内部一致性。
通过内容效度验证确定了18项阴虚表现项目和14项阳虚表现项目。5名2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者进行了可理解性和重测信度测试。5名参与者中有3名参与者的每个表现项目的可理解性得分水平为中等或高。重测信度表明,阴虚表现项目总数的单次测量ICC为0.99(95%CI:0.89 - 0.99),第1天和第14天的中位数得分分别为17(IQR 6.5 - 27)和21(IQR 6 - 29)(P = 0.144)。阳虚表现项目总数的单次测量ICC为0.88(95%CI:0.79 - 0.99),第1天和第14天的中位数得分分别为10(IQR 6 - 18)和14(IQR 7 - 23)(P = 0.144)。对140名T2DM调查参与者使用YY - AQ进行的描述性相关性研究结果表明,阴虚和阳虚表现项目总数的内部一致性令人满意,Cronbach'sα分别为0.79和0.78。
YY - AQ将进一步测试其可理解性、重测和内部一致性信度、评分系统效度、结构效度、收敛效度和区分效度、反应度和预测效度。