Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚赌博流行率的全国估计:双框架综合调查的结果。

National estimates of Australian gambling prevalence: f indings from a dual-frame omnibus survey.

作者信息

Dowling N A, Youssef G J, Jackson A C, Pennay D W, Francis K L, Pennay A, Lubman D I

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.

Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):420-35. doi: 10.1111/add.13176. Epub 2015 Nov 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIMS AND DESIGN: The increase in mobile telephone-only households may be a source of bias for traditional landline gambling prevalence surveys. Aims were to: (1) identify Australian gambling participation and problem gambling prevalence using a dual-frame (50% landline and 50% mobile telephone) computer-assisted telephone interviewing methodology; (2) explore the predictors of sample frame and telephone status; and (3) explore the degree to which sample frame and telephone status moderate the relationships between respondent characteristics and problem gambling.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 2000 adult respondents residing in Australia were interviewed from March to April 2013.

MEASUREMENTS

Participation in multiple gambling activities and Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI).

FINDINGS

Estimates were: gambling participation [63.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 61.4-66.3], problem gambling (0.4%, 95% CI = 0.2-0.8), moderate-risk gambling (1.9%, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) and low-risk gambling (3.0%, 95% CI = 2.2-4.0). Relative to the landline frame, the mobile frame was more likely to gamble on horse/greyhound races [odds ratio (OR) = 1.4], casino table games (OR = 5.0), sporting events (OR = 2.2), private games (OR = 1.9) and the internet (OR = 6.5); less likely to gamble on lotteries (OR = 0.6); and more likely to gamble on five or more activities (OR = 2.4), display problem gambling (OR = 6.4) and endorse PGSI items (OR = 2.4-6.1). Only casino table gambling (OR = 2.9) and internet gambling (OR = 3.5) independently predicted mobile frame membership. Telephone status (landline frame versus mobile dual users and mobile-only users) displayed similar findings. Finally, sample frame and/or telephone status moderated the relationship between gender, relationship status, health and problem gambling (OR = 2.9-7.6).

CONCLUSION

Given expected future increases in the mobile telephone-only population, best practice in population gambling research should use dual frame sampling methodologies (at least 50% landline and 50% mobile telephone) for telephone interviewing.

摘要

背景、目的与设计:仅使用移动电话的家庭数量增加可能会给传统的固定电话赌博流行率调查带来偏差。目的是:(1)采用双框架(50%固定电话和50%移动电话)计算机辅助电话访谈方法确定澳大利亚的赌博参与情况和问题赌博流行率;(2)探索样本框架和电话状态的预测因素;(3)探索样本框架和电话状态在多大程度上调节受访者特征与问题赌博之间的关系。

设置与参与者

2013年3月至4月,对居住在澳大利亚的2000名成年受访者进行了访谈。

测量

参与多种赌博活动和问题赌博严重程度指数(PGSI)。

结果

估计结果为:赌博参与率[63.9%,95%置信区间(CI)=61.4 - 66.3],问题赌博率(0.4%,95%CI = 0.2 - 0.8),中度风险赌博率(1.9%,95%CI = 1.3 - 2.6)和低风险赌博率(3.0%,95%CI = 2.2 - 4.0)。相对于固定电话框架,移动电话框架的受访者更有可能参与赛马/赛狗赌博[优势比(OR)=1.4]、赌场桌游赌博(OR = 5.0)、体育赛事赌博(OR = 2.2)、私人游戏赌博(OR = 1.9)和网络赌博(OR = 6.5);参与彩票赌博的可能性较小(OR = 0.6);参与五项或更多活动赌博的可能性更大(OR = 2.4),出现问题赌博的可能性更大(OR = 6.4),认可PGSI项目的可能性更大(OR = 2.4 - 6.1)。只有赌场桌游赌博(OR = 2.9)和网络赌博(OR = 3.5)能独立预测移动电话框架成员身份。电话状态(固定电话框架与移动电话双用户和仅使用移动电话的用户)显示出类似的结果。最后,样本框架和/或电话状态调节了性别、恋爱状况、健康状况与问题赌博之间的关系(OR = 2.9 - 7.6)。

结论

鉴于未来仅使用移动电话的人口预计会增加,在总体赌博研究中的最佳做法应该是在电话访谈中采用双框架抽样方法(至少50%固定电话和50%移动电话)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e456/5063184/9b7769842dcc/ADD-111-420-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验