Jing Hao, Wang Shu-Lian, Li Jing, Xue Mei, Xiong Zu-Kun, Jin Jing, Wang Wei-Hu, Song Yong-Wen, Liu Yue-Ping, Ren Hua, Fang Hui, Yu Zi-Hao, Liu Xin-Fan, Li Ye-Xiong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Oct 1;93(2):268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
To map the location of metastatic supraclavicular (SCV) lymph nodes (LNMs) in breast cancer patients with SCV node involvement and determine whether and where the radiation therapy clinical target volume (CTV) of this region could be modified in high-risk subsets.
Fifty-five patients with metastatic SCV LNMs were eligible for geographic mapping and atlas coverage analysis. All LNMs and their epicenters were registered proportionally by referencing the surrounding landmarks onto simulation computed tomography images of a standard patient. CTVs based on selected SCV atlases, including the one by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) were contoured. A modified SCV CTV was tried and shown to have better involved-node coverage and thus theoretically improved prophylaxis in this setting.
A total of 50 (91%) and 45 (81.8%) patients had LNMs in the medial and lateral SCV subregions, respectively. Also, 36 patients (65.5%) had LNMs located at the junction of the jugular-subclavian veins. All nodes were covered in only 25.5% to 41.8% of patients by different atlases. The RTOG atlas covered all nodes in 25.5% of patients. Stratified by the nodes in all the patients as a whole, 49.2% to 81.3% were covered, and the RTOG atlas covered 62.6%. The lateral and posterior borders were the most overlooked locations. Modification by extending the borders to natural anatomic barriers allowed the new CTV to cover all the nodes in 81.8% of patients and encompass 96.1% of all the nodes.
According to the distribution of SCV LNMs, the extent of existing atlases might not be adequate for potential metastatic sites in certain groups of patients. The extension of the lateral and posterior CTV borders in high-risk or recurrent patients might be a reasonable approach for increasing coverage. However, additional data in more homogeneous populations with localized disease are needed before routine application.
绘制锁骨上(SCV)淋巴结转移(LNM)的乳腺癌患者中转移的SCV淋巴结的位置,并确定在高危亚组中该区域的放射治疗临床靶区(CTV)是否以及在何处可以修改。
55例有转移性SCV LNM的患者符合地理定位和图谱覆盖分析的条件。通过将周围地标按比例参考到标准患者的模拟计算机断层扫描图像上,对所有LNM及其中心点进行登记。基于选定的SCV图谱(包括放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)的图谱)勾画CTV。尝试了一种改良的SCV CTV,并显示其对受累淋巴结的覆盖更好,因此在这种情况下理论上可改善预防效果。
分别有50例(91%)和45例(81.8%)患者在内侧和外侧SCV亚区域有LNM。此外,36例患者(65.5%)的LNM位于颈静脉-锁骨下静脉交界处。不同图谱仅覆盖了25.5%至41.8%的患者的所有淋巴结。RTOG图谱覆盖了25.5%的患者的所有淋巴结。以所有患者的淋巴结进行分层,覆盖范围为49.2%至81.3%,RTOG图谱覆盖了62.6%。外侧和后边界是最容易被忽视的位置。通过将边界扩展到自然解剖屏障进行修改后,新的CTV覆盖了81.8%的患者的所有淋巴结,涵盖了所有淋巴结的96.1%。
根据SCV LNM的分布情况,现有图谱的范围可能不足以覆盖某些患者群体中的潜在转移部位。在高危或复发患者中扩展外侧和后侧CTV边界可能是增加覆盖范围的合理方法。然而,在常规应用之前,需要在更多患有局限性疾病的同质人群中获取更多数据。