Gentile Michelle S, Usman Asad A, Neuschler Erin I, Sathiaseelan Vythialinga, Hayes John P, Small William
Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Radiology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Oct 1;93(2):257-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
The purpose of this study was to identify the axillary lymph nodes on pretreatment diagnostic computed tomography (CT) of the chest to determine their position relative to the anatomic axillary borders as defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) breast cancer atlas for radiation therapy planning.
Pretreatment diagnostic CT chest scans available for 30 breast cancer patients with clinically involved lymph nodes were fused with simulation CT. Contouring of axillary levels I, II, and III according to the RTOG guidelines was performed. Measurements were made from the area of distal tumor to the anatomic borders in 6 dimensions for each level.
Of the 30 patients, 100%, 93%, and 37% had clinical involvement of levels I, II, and III, respectively. The mean number of lymph nodes dissected was 13.6. The mean size of the largest lymph node was 2.4 cm. Extracapsular extension was seen in 23% of patients. In 97% of patients, an aspect of the involved lymph node lay outside of the anatomic border of a level. In 80% and 83% of patients, tumor extension was seen outside the cranial (1.78 ± 1.0 cm; range, 0.28-3.58 cm) and anterior (1.27 ± 0.92 cm; range, 0.24-3.58 cm) borders of level I, respectively. In 80% of patients, tumor extension was seen outside the caudal border of level II (1.36 ± 1.0 cm, range, 0.27-3.86 cm), and 0% to 33% of patients had tumor extension outside the remaining borders of all levels.
To cover 95% of lymph nodes at the cranial and anterior borders of level I, an additional clinical target volume margin of 3.78 cm and 3.11 cm, respectively, is necessary. The RTOG guidelines may be insufficient for coverage of axillary disease in patients with clinical nodal involvement who are undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, incomplete axillary dissection, or treatment with intensity modulated radiation therapy. In patients with pretreatment diagnostic CT chest scans, fusion with simulation CT should be considered for tumor delineation.
本研究旨在识别胸部治疗前诊断性计算机断层扫描(CT)上的腋窝淋巴结,以确定其相对于放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)乳腺癌图谱所定义的腋窝解剖边界的位置,用于放射治疗计划。
对30例临床有淋巴结受累的乳腺癌患者的治疗前诊断性胸部CT扫描与模拟CT进行融合。根据RTOG指南对腋窝Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ级进行轮廓勾画。对每个级别从肿瘤远端区域到解剖边界进行6个维度的测量。
30例患者中,Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ级临床受累的比例分别为100%、93%和37%。平均切除的淋巴结数量为13.6个。最大淋巴结的平均大小为2.4 cm。23%的患者可见包膜外侵犯。97%的患者中,受累淋巴结的一部分位于某一级别的解剖边界之外。80%和83%的患者中,分别在Ⅰ级的头侧(1.78±1.0 cm;范围,0.28 - 3.58 cm)和前侧(1.27±0.92 cm;范围,0.24 - 3.58 cm)边界外可见肿瘤侵犯。80%的患者在Ⅱ级的尾侧边界外可见肿瘤侵犯(1.36±1.0 cm,范围,0.27 - 3.86 cm),0%至33%的患者在所有级别的其余边界外有肿瘤侵犯。
为覆盖Ⅰ级头侧和前侧边界95%的淋巴结,分别需要额外3.78 cm和3.11 cm的临床靶区边缘。对于接受新辅助化疗、腋窝清扫不完全或调强放射治疗的临床有淋巴结受累的患者,RTOG指南可能不足以覆盖腋窝疾病。对于有治疗前诊断性胸部CT扫描的患者,为进行肿瘤勾画应考虑与模拟CT融合。