Department of Psychosis Studies,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
MRC Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre,Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London,London,UK.
Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(2):317-26. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001816. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
The relationship between childhood adversity (CA) and psychotic disorder is well documented. As the adequacy of the current categorical diagnosis of psychosis is being increasingly questioned, we explored independent associations between different types of CA and specific psychotic symptom dimensions in a well-characterized sample of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients.
This study involved 236 FEP cases aged 18-65 years who presented for the first time to psychiatric services in South London, UK. Psychopathology was assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the statistical fit of the Wallwork/Fortgang five-factor model of psychosis. CA prior to 17 years of age (physical abuse, sexual abuse, parental separation, parental death, and being taken into care) was retrospectively assessed using the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire.
Childhood sexual abuse [β = 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-1.52], childhood physical abuse (β = 0.48, 95% CI 0.03-0.93) and parental separation (β = 0.60, 95% CI 0.10-1.11) showed significant associations with the positive dimension; while being taken into care was associated with the excited dimension (β = 0.36, 95% CI 0.08-0.65), independent of the other types of CA. No significant associations were found between parental death and any of the symptom dimensions.
A degree of specificity was found in the relationships between different types of CA and psychosis symptom dimensions in adulthood, suggesting that distinct pathways may be involved in the CA-psychosis association. These potentially different routes to developing psychosis merit further empirical and theoretical exploration.
儿童逆境(CA)与精神病的关系已有充分记录。随着当前精神病分类诊断的充分性受到越来越多的质疑,我们在一个具有特征的首发精神病(FEP)患者样本中探索了不同类型的 CA 与特定精神病症状维度之间的独立关联。
本研究涉及 236 名年龄在 18-65 岁之间的首次在英国伦敦南部的精神科就诊的 FEP 病例。采用阳性和阴性综合征量表评估精神病理学,采用 Wallwork/Fortgang 五因素精神病模型进行验证性因子分析,以评估该模型的统计拟合度。17 岁之前的 CA(身体虐待、性虐待、父母分离、父母死亡和被送进福利院)采用儿童经历关爱和虐待问卷进行回顾性评估。
儿童性虐待[β=0.96,95%置信区间(CI)0.40-1.52]、儿童身体虐待(β=0.48,95%CI 0.03-0.93)和父母分离(β=0.60,95%CI 0.10-1.11)与阳性维度显著相关;而被送进福利院与兴奋维度相关(β=0.36,95%CI 0.08-0.65),与其他类型的 CA 无关。父母死亡与任何症状维度均无显著关联。
在不同类型的 CA 与成年期精神病症状维度之间的关系中发现了一定程度的特异性,这表明在 CA 与精神病的关联中可能涉及不同的途径。这些潜在的不同途径发展精神病值得进一步的实证和理论探索。