Suppr超能文献

假装裁判无能力。

Feigned Adjudicative Incompetence.

机构信息

1 University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2017 Mar;24(2):173-182. doi: 10.1177/1073191115605613. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Abstract

Psychological assessments are highly dependent on the forthrightness and sincere efforts of examinees. In particular, evaluations in forensic settings must consider whether feigning or other response styles are utilized to intentionally distort the clinical presentation. The current study examines the effectiveness of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) at detecting feigned incompetency within a sample of jail detainees. As an ancillary goal, several scales of the Standardized Assessment of Miranda Abilities were included in the same within-subjects simulation design. Results of the total ILK score raised concerns regarding the mischaracterization of genuine offenders as "suggestive of feigning." Pending cross-validation, however, a Revised ILK proved highly effective, using a floor effect detection strategy. Although intended for Miranda-specific abilities, several detection strategies on the Standardized Assessment of Miranda Abilities appeared to be very promising within a broadened context of feigned incompetency.

摘要

心理评估高度依赖于被试者的坦率和真诚努力。特别是,在法医环境下的评估必须考虑是否存在伪装或其他反应模式,以故意扭曲临床表现。本研究在看守所被拘留者样本中检验了法律知识量表(Inventory of Legal Knowledge,ILK)检测伪装失能的效果。作为辅助目标,在相同的被试内模拟设计中纳入了 Miranda 能力标准化评估的几个量表。总 ILK 得分的结果令人担忧,因为这可能会将真正的罪犯错误地描述为“提示伪装”。然而,在交叉验证之前,使用地板效应检测策略的修订版 ILK 被证明非常有效。尽管该量表是专门为 Miranda 特定能力设计的,但 Miranda 能力标准化评估中的几种检测策略在扩大的伪装失能范围内似乎非常有前途。

相似文献

1
Feigned Adjudicative Incompetence.
Assessment. 2017 Mar;24(2):173-182. doi: 10.1177/1073191115605613. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
3
Dodging Self-Incriminations: An Examination of Feigned Miranda Abilities on the SAMA.
Assessment. 2017 Dec;24(8):975-986. doi: 10.1177/1073191116634206. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
4
Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial.
Assessment. 2017 Mar;24(2):232-243. doi: 10.1177/1073191115605631. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.
Behav Sci Law. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):614-29. doi: 10.1002/bsl.950.
7
Cross-validation of the PAI Negative Distortion Scale for feigned mental disorders: a research report.
Assessment. 2013 Feb;20(1):36-42. doi: 10.1177/1073191112451493. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
8
A Literature Analysis of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2021 Mar;49(1):87-95. doi: 10.29158/JAAPL.200042-20. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
10
Cognitive status and profile validity on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in offenders with serious mental illness.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Feb;50:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Influences on understanding of a verbally presented police caution amongst adults involved in the criminal justice system: a systematic review.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 11;28(1):70-93. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1767711. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验