Suppr超能文献

假装在裁判能力评估中。

Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations.

机构信息

DepartmentofPsychiatry, CaseWestern Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.

出版信息

Behav Sci Law. 2010 Sep-Oct;28(5):614-29. doi: 10.1002/bsl.950.

Abstract

Competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence) is the most requested forensic psychiatric evaluation, with an estimated 60,000 referrals annually. The challenge of detecting feigned incompetence has not been systematically studied until the past decade. Estimates of feigned adjudicative incompetence vary from 8 to 21%. This article reviews techniques for detecting malingered psychosis and malingered cognitive impairment during competence evaluations. Specific techniques for assessing feigned adjudicative incompetence and estimating the malingerer's genuine abilities are discussed. A stepwise approach to suspected feigned adjudicative incompetence is proffered.

摘要

审判能力(裁判能力)是最常请求的法医精神病学评估,每年约有 60,000 次转介。直到过去十年,才对检测假装无能力的挑战进行了系统研究。假装裁判无能力的估计值从 8%到 21%不等。本文回顾了在能力评估期间检测假装精神病和假装认知障碍的技术。讨论了评估假装裁判无能力和估计伪装者的真实能力的特定技术。提出了一种对疑似假装裁判无能力的逐步方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验