Costanzo Maria Rosa, Negoianu Daniel, Fonarow Gregg C, Jaski Brian E, Bart Bradley A, Heywood J Thomas, Nabut Jose L, Schollmeyer Michael P
Advocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL.
Division of Nephrology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Am Heart J. 2015 Sep;170(3):471-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
In patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated heart failure, unresolved signs and symptoms of fluid overload have been consistently associated with poor outcomes. Regardless of dosing and type of administration, intravenous loop diuretics have not reduced heart failure events or mortality in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure. The results of trials comparing intravenous loop diuretics to mechanical fluid removal by isolated venovenous ultrafiltration have yielded conflicting results. Studies evaluating early decongestive strategies have shown that ultrafiltration removed more fluid and was associated with fewer heart failure-related rehospitalization than intravenous loop diuretics. In contrast, when used in the setting of worsening renal function, ultrafiltration was associated with poorer renal outcomes and no reduction in heart failure events.
The AVOID-HF trial seeks to determine if an early strategy of ultrafiltration in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure is associated with fewer heart failure events at 90 days compared with a strategy based on intravenous loop diuretics. Study subjects from 40 highly experienced institutions are randomized to either early ultrafiltration or intravenous loop diuretics. In both treatment arms, fluid removal therapies are adjusted according to the patients' hemodynamic condition and renal function. The study was unilaterally terminated by the sponsor in the absence of futility and safety concerns after the enrollment of 221 subjects, or 27% of the originally planned sample size of 810 patients.
The AVOID-HF trial's principal aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of ultrafiltration vs that of intravenous loop diuretics in patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated heart failure. Because stepped treatment approaches are applied in both ultrafiltration and intravenous loop diuretics groups and the primary end point is time to first heart failure event within 90 days, it is hoped that the AVOID-HF trial, despite its untimely termination by the sponsor, will provide further insight on how to optimally decongest patients with fluid-overloaded heart failure.
在因急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院的患者中,液体超负荷的体征和症状未得到缓解一直与不良预后相关。无论静脉注射袢利尿剂的剂量和给药方式如何,其均未降低急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者的心力衰竭事件发生率或死亡率。比较静脉注射袢利尿剂与单纯静脉-静脉超滤进行机械性液体清除的试验结果相互矛盾。评估早期充血性心力衰竭治疗策略的研究表明,与静脉注射袢利尿剂相比,超滤清除的液体更多,且与心力衰竭相关再住院率较低有关。相比之下,在肾功能恶化的情况下使用超滤,与较差的肾脏预后相关,且未能降低心力衰竭事件发生率。
“AVOID-HF试验”旨在确定,与基于静脉注射袢利尿剂的策略相比,急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者早期进行超滤的策略是否会在90天时减少心力衰竭事件。来自40个经验丰富的机构的研究对象被随机分为早期超滤组或静脉注射袢利尿剂组。在两个治疗组中,均根据患者的血流动力学状况和肾功能调整液体清除治疗。在招募了221名受试者(占原计划样本量810名患者的27%)后,该研究在不存在无效性和安全性问题的情况下被主办方单方面终止。
“AVOID-HF试验”的主要目的是比较超滤与静脉注射袢利尿剂在急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者中的安全性和有效性。由于超滤组和静脉注射袢利尿剂组均采用了逐步治疗方法,且主要终点是90天内首次发生心力衰竭事件的时间,因此希望“AVOID-HF试验”尽管被主办方提前终止,但仍能为如何最佳地减轻液体超负荷心力衰竭患者的充血状况提供进一步的见解。