Division of Pharmacy, School of Medicine Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
JMIR Med Inform. 2015 Sep 18;3(3):e30. doi: 10.2196/medinform.4457.
With the aim of improving health care processes through health information technology (HIT), the US government has promulgated requirements for "meaningful use" (MU) of electronic health records (EHRs) as a condition for providers receiving financial incentives for the adoption and use of these systems. Considerable uncertainty remains about the impact of these requirements on the effective application of EHR systems.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)-sponsored Centers for Education and Research in Therapeutics (CERTs) critically examined the impact of the MU policy relating to the use of medications and jointly developed recommendations to help inform future HIT policy.
We gathered perspectives from a wide range of stakeholders (N=35) who had experience with MU requirements, including academicians, practitioners, and policy makers from different health care organizations including and beyond the CERTs. Specific issues and recommendations were discussed and agreed on as a group.
Stakeholders' knowledge and experiences from implementing MU requirements fell into 6 domains: (1) accuracy of medication lists and medication reconciliation, (2) problem list accuracy and the shift in HIT priorities, (3) accuracy of allergy lists and allergy-related standards development, (4) support of safer and effective prescribing for children, (5) considerations for rural communities, and (6) general issues with achieving MU. Standards are needed to better facilitate the exchange of data elements between health care settings. Several organizations felt that their preoccupation with fulfilling MU requirements stifled innovation. Greater emphasis should be placed on local HIT configurations that better address population health care needs.
Although MU has stimulated adoption of EHRs, its effects on quality and safety remain uncertain. Stakeholders felt that MU requirements should be more flexible and recognize that integrated models may achieve information-sharing goals in alternate ways. Future certification rules and requirements should enhance EHR functionalities critical for safer prescribing of medications in children.
为了通过医疗信息技术(HIT)改善医疗保健流程,美国政府颁布了电子健康记录(EHR)“有意义使用”(MU)的要求,作为医疗机构获得采用和使用这些系统的经济激励的条件。关于这些要求对 EHR 系统的有效应用的影响,仍然存在相当大的不确定性。
医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)赞助的治疗教育和研究中心(CERTs)批判性地审查了与使用药物相关的 MU 政策的影响,并共同制定了建议,以帮助为未来的 HIT 政策提供信息。
我们从具有 MU 要求经验的广泛利益相关者(N=35)那里收集了观点,包括来自不同医疗保健组织的学者、从业者和政策制定者,这些组织包括但不限于 CERTs。小组讨论并商定了具体问题和建议。
利益相关者在实施 MU 要求方面的知识和经验分为 6 个领域:(1)药物清单和药物重整的准确性,(2)问题清单的准确性和 HIT 优先事项的转变,(3)过敏清单和过敏相关标准的开发的准确性,(4)支持儿童更安全和有效的处方,(5)农村社区的考虑因素,以及(6)实现 MU 的一般问题。需要制定标准来更好地促进医疗保健环境之间数据元素的交换。一些组织认为,他们专注于满足 MU 要求会扼杀创新。应该更加重视更能满足人口医疗保健需求的本地 HIT 配置。
尽管 MU 刺激了 EHR 的采用,但它对质量和安全的影响仍不确定。利益相关者认为 MU 要求应该更加灵活,并认识到集成模型可以以其他方式实现信息共享目标。未来的认证规则和要求应增强 EHR 功能,这些功能对于儿童更安全地开具药物至关重要。