Suppr超能文献

评估电子儿科药物剂量规则的准确性。

Evaluating the accuracy of electronic pediatric drug dosing rules.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e43-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001793. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of vendor-supplied dosing eRules for pediatric medication orders. Inaccurate or absent dosing rules can lead to high numbers of false alerts or undetected prescribing errors and may potentially compromise safety in this already vulnerable population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

7 months of medication orders and alerts from a large pediatric hospital were analyzed. 30 medications were selected for study across 5 age ranges and 5 dosing parameters. The resulting 750 dosing rules from a commercial system formed the study corpus and were examined for accuracy against a gold standard created from traditional clinical resources.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy of the rules in the study corpus was 55.1% when the rules were transformed to fit a priori age ranges. Over a pediatric lifetime, the dosing rules were accurate an average of 57.6% of the days. Dosing rules pertaining to the newborn age range were as accurate as other age ranges on average, but exhibited more variability. Daily frequency dosing parameters showed more accuracy than total daily dose, single dose minimum, or single dose maximum.

DISCUSSION

The accuracy of a vendor-supplied set of dosing eRules is suboptimal when compared with traditional dosing sources, exposing a gap between dosing rules in commercial products and actual prescribing practices by pediatric care providers. More research on vendor-supplied eRules is warranted in order to understand the effects of these products on safe prescribing in children.

摘要

目的

确定供应商提供的儿科药物医嘱剂量规则的准确性。不准确或缺失的剂量规则可能导致大量虚假警报或未检测到的处方错误,并可能使本已脆弱的人群的安全性受到潜在威胁。

材料与方法

分析了一家大型儿科医院 7 个月的药物医嘱和警报。选择了 30 种药物,跨越 5 个年龄范围和 5 个剂量参数进行研究。来自商业系统的 750 个剂量规则构成了研究语料库,并根据传统临床资源创建的黄金标准来检查其准确性。

结果

当规则转换为适合先验年龄范围时,研究语料库中规则的总体准确性为 55.1%。在儿科患者的一生中,这些剂量规则的准确性平均为每天 57.6%。与其他年龄范围相比,新生儿年龄范围的剂量规则平均准确,但表现出更多的可变性。每日频率剂量参数比总每日剂量、单次最小剂量或单次最大剂量更准确。

讨论

与传统的剂量来源相比,供应商提供的一套剂量规则的准确性并不理想,这表明商业产品中的剂量规则与儿科护理提供者的实际处方实践之间存在差距。需要对供应商提供的电子规则进行更多研究,以了解这些产品对儿童安全处方的影响。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy of electronic pediatric drug dosing rules.评估电子儿科药物剂量规则的准确性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb;21(e1):e43-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001793. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
3
Prescription order risk factors for pediatric dosing alerts.儿科给药警报的处方医嘱风险因素。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Feb;84(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication errors in paediatric outpatients.儿科门诊患者的用药错误。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Dec;19(6):e30. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2008.031179. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
7
Adverse drug events in pediatric outpatients.儿科门诊患者的药物不良事件。
Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.05.005.
8
Evaluating the off-label use of medications in children.评估儿童药物的非标签使用情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Jun 1;63(11):1062-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050476.
9
Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry.计算机化医生医嘱录入系统中药物安全警报的忽略
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):138-47. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1809. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
10
Pediatric medication errors: what do we know? What gaps remain?儿科用药错误:我们了解什么?还存在哪些差距?
Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1):73-81. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0073:pmewdw>2.0.co;2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验