Suppr超能文献

比较葡萄糖酸铁钠与蔗糖铁在血液透析患者中的短期安全性。

Comparative Short-term Safety of Sodium Ferric Gluconate Versus Iron Sucrose in Hemodialysis Patients.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 Jan;67(1):119-27. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.026. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite different pharmacologic properties, little is known about the comparative safety of sodium ferric gluconate versus iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the clinical database of a large dialysis provider (2004-2005) merged with administrative data from the US Renal Data System.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 66,207 patients with Medicare coverage who received center-based hemodialysis.

PREDICTORS

Iron formulation use assessed during repeated 1-month exposure periods (n=278,357).

OUTCOMES

All-cause mortality, infection-related hospitalizations and mortality, and cardiovascular-related hospitalizations and mortality occurring during a 3-month follow-up period.

MEASUREMENTS

For all outcomes, we estimated 90-day risk differences between the formulations using propensity score weighting of Kaplan-Meier functions, which controlled for a wide range of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. Risk differences were also estimated within various clinically important subgroups.

RESULTS

Ferric gluconate was administered in 11.4%; iron sucrose, in 48.9%; and no iron in 39.7% of the periods. Risks for most study outcomes did not differ between ferric gluconate and iron sucrose; however, among patients with a hemodialysis catheter, use of ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for both infection-related death (risk difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.5% to 0.0%) and infection-related hospitalization (risk difference, -1.5%; 95% CI, -2.3% to -0.6%). Bolus dosing was associated with an increase in infection-related events among both ferric gluconate and iron sucrose users.

LIMITATIONS

Residual confounding and outcome measurement error.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the 2 iron formulations studied exhibited similar safety profiles; however, ferric gluconate was associated with a slightly decreased risk for infection-related outcomes compared to iron sucrose among patients with a hemodialysis catheter. These associations should be explored further using other data or study designs.

摘要

背景

尽管具有不同的药理学特性,但对于在血液透析患者中,葡萄糖酸亚铁与蔗糖铁的相对安全性知之甚少。

研究设计

使用大型透析提供者的临床数据库(2004-2005 年)与美国肾脏数据系统的行政数据合并进行的回顾性队列研究。

设置和参与者

66207 名接受中心血液透析的医疗保险覆盖患者。

预测因子

在重复的 1 个月暴露期内(n=278357)评估铁制剂的使用。

结果

在 3 个月的随访期间,发生全因死亡率、感染相关住院和死亡率以及心血管相关住院和死亡率。

测量

对于所有结局,我们使用倾向评分加权的 Kaplan-Meier 函数估计制剂之间的 90 天风险差异,该函数控制了广泛的人口统计学、临床和实验室变量。还在各种临床重要亚组内估计了风险差异。

结果

葡萄糖酸铁的给药率为 11.4%;蔗糖铁为 48.9%;无铁为 39.7%。大多数研究结局的风险在葡萄糖酸铁和蔗糖铁之间没有差异;然而,在血液透析导管患者中,使用葡萄糖酸铁与感染相关死亡(风险差异,-0.3%;95%CI,-0.5%至 0.0%)和感染相关住院(风险差异,-1.5%;95%CI,-2.3%至-0.6%)的风险均略有降低。在葡萄糖酸铁和蔗糖铁使用者中,推注剂量与感染相关事件的增加有关。

局限性

残余混杂和结果测量误差。

结论

总的来说,研究中使用的 2 种铁制剂具有相似的安全性特征;然而,与蔗糖铁相比,在血液透析导管患者中,葡萄糖酸铁与感染相关结局的风险略低。应使用其他数据或研究设计进一步探讨这些关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验