Coppol Elena, Shelly Jamie, Cheng Stephanie, Kaakeh Yaman, Shepler Brian
Elena Coppol, PharmD Student, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jamie Shelly, PharmD Student, College of Pharmacy, Purdue University.
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;45(2):241-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P466.
To review clinical trials conducted in hemodialysis patients of the 4 intravenous iron products available in the US in an attempt to discern strengths and inferiorities between products and evaluate current safety data that can be used to assist the clinician in selecting the most appropriate agent.
Literature was accessed through PubMed (January 2000-October 2010). In some cases, reference citations from selected review articles were evaluated as well.
Clinical trials published in the English language were selected using the search terms iron dextran, iron sucrose, sodium ferric gluconate, and ferumoxytol. Studies were further pared down to include only those enrolling hemodialysis patients.
There are currently 4 intravenous iron formulations in the US used to treat iron-deficiency anemia in hemodialysis patients. Ferumoxytol has not yet been directly compared to the other 3 agents. Eight studies have been conducted in hemodialysis patients directly comparing iron dextran, iron sucrose, and/or sodium ferric gluconate. These studies were further categorized for evaluation based on iron products compared. Four studies directly compared iron dextran to iron sucrose, 1 study compared iron dextran to sodium ferric gluconate, 1 study compared iron sucrose to sodium ferric gluconate, and 2 studies compared all 3 agents. Of the 3 agents, iron dextran appears to have the least favorable safety profile, while iron sucrose appears most favorable.
The newest intravenous iron product, ferumoxytol, has not been directly compared to the other 3 agents. Large well-controlled studies of these products specifically in the hemodialysis population would further help clinicians determine appropriate therapy. Iron sucrose appears to offer the most favorable safety profile when compared to iron dextran and sodium ferric gluconate in treating hemodialysis patients. Oxidative stress and hypersensitivity reactions are common problems encountered when administering intravenous iron.
回顾在美国可获得的4种静脉用铁剂产品在血液透析患者中开展的临床试验,以试图辨别各产品之间的优缺点,并评估当前可用于协助临床医生选择最合适药物的安全性数据。
通过PubMed(2000年1月至2010年10月)获取文献。在某些情况下,还对所选综述文章的参考文献进行了评估。
使用右旋糖酐铁、蔗糖铁、葡萄糖酸铁钠和铁羧麦芽糖等检索词选择以英文发表的临床试验。研究进一步筛选,仅纳入那些招募血液透析患者的研究。
目前美国有4种静脉用铁剂配方用于治疗血液透析患者的缺铁性贫血。铁羧麦芽糖尚未与其他3种药物进行直接比较。已在血液透析患者中开展了8项直接比较右旋糖酐铁、蔗糖铁和/或葡萄糖酸铁钠的研究。根据所比较的铁剂产品,这些研究进一步分类进行评估。4项研究直接比较了右旋糖酐铁与蔗糖铁,1项研究比较了右旋糖酐铁与葡萄糖酸铁钠,1项研究比较了蔗糖铁与葡萄糖酸铁钠,2项研究比较了所有3种药物。在这3种药物中,右旋糖酐铁的安全性似乎最不理想,而蔗糖铁似乎最有利。
最新的静脉用铁剂产品铁羧麦芽糖尚未与其他3种药物进行直接比较。针对这些产品在血液透析人群中开展大规模的严格对照研究将进一步帮助临床医生确定合适的治疗方法。在治疗血液透析患者时,与右旋糖酐铁和葡萄糖酸铁钠相比,蔗糖铁似乎具有最有利的安全性。氧化应激和过敏反应是静脉注射铁剂时常见的问题。