Nishina Tomohiro, Boku Narikazu, Gotoh Masahiro, Shimada Yasuhiro, Hamamoto Yasuo, Yasui Hirofumi, Yamaguchi Kensei, Kawai Hiroki, Nakayama Norisuke, Amagai Kenji, Mizusawa Junki, Nakamura Kenichi, Shirao Kuniaki, Ohtsu Atsushi
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Minami-Umenomoto Kou, Matsuyama, Ehime, 791-0280, Japan.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):902-10. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0542-8. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
This randomized phase II study compared weekly administration of paclitaxel (wPTX) with the best available 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimen as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer patients with severe peritoneal metastasis refractory to fluoropyrimidine.
In the best available 5-FU arm, continuous infusion of 5-FU (800 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-5, every 4 weeks) was given to patients with prior chemotherapy including bolus 5-FU, and methotrexate and 5-FU sequential bolus injection (methotrexate at 100 mg/m(2) followed by bolus 5-FU at 600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin, weekly) was given to those who had previously received continuous infusion of 5-FU or oral administration of fluoropyrimidine. In the wPTX arm, paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was administered on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks. This study adopted a screening design (one-sided α = 30 %) with the primary end point of overall survival.
One hundred patients were randomized to the 5-FU arm (n = 49) or the wPTX arm (n = 51). Although the median survival time was 7.7 months in both arms, the 2-year survival rates were 2.9 % in the 5-FU arm and 9.1 % in the wPTX arm [hazard ratio 0.89 (95 % confidence interval 0.57-1.38), one-sided p = 0.298}. The median progression-free survival was longer with wPTX than with 5-FU [3.7 months vs 2.4 months; hazard ratio 0.58 (95 % confidence interval 0.38-0.88), one-sided p = 0.005]. The incidences of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and treatment-related death were 6 %, 4 %, 10 %, and 2 %, respectively, in the 5-FU arm and 2 %, 0 %, 0 %, and 0 %, respectively, in the wPTX arm.
As second-line chemotherapy, wPTX appears feasible and promising. This regimen can be included in a test arm in future phase III trials for treatment of advanced gastric cancer with severe peritoneal metastasis.
本随机II期研究比较了晚期胃癌伴严重腹膜转移且对氟嘧啶耐药患者二线治疗中,每周给予紫杉醇(wPTX)与最佳可用的5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)方案的疗效。
在最佳可用的5-FU组中,对先前接受过包括推注5-FU在内的化疗患者,持续输注5-FU(800mg/m²/天,第1 - 5天,每4周一次);对先前接受过5-FU持续输注或氟嘧啶口服给药的患者,给予甲氨蝶呤和5-FU序贯推注(甲氨蝶呤100mg/m²,随后推注5-FU 600mg/m²并加用亚叶酸钙,每周一次)。在wPTX组中,紫杉醇(80mg/m²)于第1、8和15天给药,每4周一次。本研究采用筛选设计(单侧α = 30%),主要终点为总生存期。
100例患者被随机分为5-FU组(n = 49)或wPTX组(n = 51)。虽然两组的中位生存期均为7.7个月,但5-FU组的2年生存率为2.9%,wPTX组为9.1%[风险比0.89(95%置信区间0.57 - 1.38),单侧p = 0.298]。wPTX组的中位无进展生存期长于5-FU组[3.7个月对2.4个月;风险比0.58(95%置信区间0.38 - 0.88),单侧p = 0.005]。5-FU组4级中性粒细胞减少、3/4级发热性中性粒细胞减少、腹泻及治疗相关死亡的发生率分别为6%、4%、10%和2%,wPTX组分别为2%、0%、0%和0%。
作为二线化疗,wPTX似乎可行且有前景。该方案可纳入未来III期试验的试验组,用于治疗伴有严重腹膜转移的晚期胃癌。