Suppr超能文献

迈向治疗序贯策略:晚期胃癌/胃食管结合部腺癌治疗方案的系统评价。

Toward a Treatment Sequencing Strategy: A Systematic Review of Treatment Regimens in Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

University of Chicago Medical Center & Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):e1704-e1729. doi: 10.1002/onco.13907. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Platinum and fluoropyrimidine combinations typically comprise first-line (1L) therapy in advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA), although controversy exists regarding the use of 5doublet versus triplet cytotoxic regimens. Historically, second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) therapy has been fragmented. Recent trials have increased the need for optimal treatment sequencing in advanced G/GEA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed manuscripts of randomized clinical trials examining 1L, 2L, and 3L+ therapy for advanced G/GEA published from 2009 through November 19, 2019. When available, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, overall response rate, and toxicity were extracted from each and compared descriptively.

RESULTS

In 1L therapy, chemotherapy triplets demonstrated variable efficacy improvements with invariable increased toxicity compared with platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublets. Currently, the only published report of positive outcomes using biologics in 1L describes adding trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing advanced G/GEA. In 2L, doublet chemotherapy regimens are not uniformly more efficacious than single-agent taxanes or irinotecan, and ramucirumab has demonstrated improved outcomes both as monotherapy and in combination.

CONCLUSION

For advanced G/GEA, review of trial results from 2009-2019 support 1L therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine and sequencing with taxanes or irinotecan in combination with biologics as effective 2L options. Escalating to a triplet may add some efficacy at the expense of added toxicity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The rapidly changing treatment landscape for advanced gastric cancer includes increasing options for refractory disease. With multiple first-line platinum-based regimens, identification of those with the best benefit-to-risk ratio may provide guidance on treatment sequencing strategies. This article presents findings from the published literature of randomized controlled trials that included a first-line platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination and, for second-line trials, patients with platinum/fluoropyrimidine-refractory disease. This guiding summary could be a tool for clinicians to identify the optimal first-line regimen(s) followed by a strategy for subsequent regimens.

摘要

背景

铂类和氟嘧啶类联合方案通常构成晚期胃癌或胃食管结合部腺癌(G/GEA)的一线(1L)治疗,尽管在使用五药联合还是三药联合细胞毒方案方面存在争议。历史上,二线(2L)和三线或更后线(3L+)治疗是零散的。最近的试验增加了对晚期 G/GEA 最佳治疗顺序的需求。

材料和方法

我们对 2009 年 11 月 19 日之前发表的关于晚期 G/GEA 的 1L、2L 和 3L+治疗的随机临床试验的同行评议文献进行了系统搜索。当可用时,从每个试验中提取总生存期、无进展生存期、疾病进展时间、总缓解率和毒性,并进行描述性比较。

结果

在 1L 治疗中,与铂类/氟嘧啶类双联方案相比,化疗三联方案的疗效有所提高,但毒性也增加了。目前,唯一发表的关于在 1L 中使用生物制剂的阳性结果的报告描述了在 HER2 过表达的晚期 G/GEA 中添加曲妥珠单抗。在 2L 中,双药化疗方案并不总是比单药紫杉类或伊立替康更有效,而雷莫芦单抗作为单药或联合治疗都显示出了改善的结果。

结论

对于晚期 G/GEA,对 2009-2019 年试验结果的回顾支持 1L 治疗采用铂类和氟嘧啶类,并采用紫杉类或伊立替康联合生物制剂作为有效的 2L 选择进行序贯治疗。升级为三联方案可能会增加一些疗效,但代价是增加毒性。

意义

晚期胃癌的治疗格局正在迅速变化,包括对难治性疾病的选择越来越多。随着多种一线铂类方案的出现,确定那些具有最佳获益风险比的方案可能有助于指导治疗顺序策略。本文介绍了来自随机对照试验的已发表文献的研究结果,这些试验包括一线铂类/氟嘧啶类联合方案,以及二线试验中,铂类/氟嘧啶类耐药疾病的患者。这一指导性总结可以成为临床医生确定最佳一线方案的工具,然后制定后续方案的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/172f/8488781/5a687cf471d8/ONCO-26-e1704-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验