Munzone E, Giobbie-Hurder A, Gusterson B A, Mallon E, Viale G, Thürlimann B, Ejlertsen B, MacGrogan G, Bibeau F, Lelkaitis G, Price K N, Gelber R D, Coates A S, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M
Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) Statistical Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2442-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv391. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
We investigated the outcomes of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, early breast cancer with special histotypes (mucinous, tubular, or cribriform) enrolled in the monotherapy cohort of the BIG 1-98 trial.
The intention-to-treat BIG 1-98 monotherapy cohort (5 years of therapy with tamoxifen or letrozole) included 4922 women, of whom 4091 had central pathology review. Histotype groups were defined as: mucinous (N = 100), tubular/cribriform (N = 83), ductal (N = 3257), and other (N = 651). Of 183 women with either mucinous or tubular/cribriform tumors, 96 were randomly assigned to letrozole and 87 to tamoxifen. Outcomes assessed were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Median follow-up in the analytic cohort was 8.1 years.
Women with tubular/cribriform breast cancer had the best outcomes for all end points compared with the other three histotypes, and had less breast cancer recurrence (97.5% 5-year BCFI) than those with mucinous (93.5%), ductal (88.9%), or other (89.9%) histotypes. Patients with mucinous or tubular/cribriform carcinoma had better DRFI (5-year rates 97.8% and 98.8%, respectively) than those with ductal (90.9%) or other (92.1%) carcinomas. Within the subgroup of women with special histotypes, we observed a nonsignificant increase in the hazard of breast cancer recurrence with letrozole [hazard (letrozole versus tamoxifen): 3.31, 95% confidence interval 0.94-11.7; P = 0.06].
Women with mucinous or tubular/cribriform breast cancer have better outcomes than those with other histotypes, although the observation is based on a limited number of events. In postmenopausal women with these histotypes, the magnitude of the letrozole advantage compared with tamoxifen may not be as large in patients with mucinous or tubular/cribriform disease.
NCT00004205.
我们调查了参加BIG 1-98试验单药治疗队列的激素受体阳性、早期特殊组织学类型(黏液性、管状或筛状)的绝经后乳腺癌女性的预后情况。
意向性治疗的BIG 1-98单药治疗队列(他莫昔芬或来曲唑治疗5年)包括4922名女性,其中4091名接受了中心病理学检查。组织学类型组定义为:黏液性(N = 100)、管状/筛状(N = 83)、导管性(N = 3257)和其他(N = 651)。在183名患有黏液性或管状/筛状肿瘤的女性中,96名被随机分配到来曲唑组,87名被分配到他莫昔芬组。评估的预后指标包括无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)、无乳腺癌间期(BCFI)和无远处复发病间期(DRFI)。分析队列的中位随访时间为8.1年。
与其他三种组织学类型相比,管状/筛状乳腺癌女性在所有终点指标上的预后最佳,且其乳腺癌复发率(5年BCFI为97.5%)低于黏液性(93.5%)、导管性(88.9%)或其他(89.9%)组织学类型的患者。黏液性或管状/筛状癌患者的DRFI(5年发生率分别为97.8%和98.8%)优于导管性(90.9%)或其他(92.1%)癌患者。在特殊组织学类型的女性亚组中,我们观察到来曲唑治疗使乳腺癌复发风险有非显著性增加[风险(来曲唑对比他莫昔芬):3.31,95%置信区间0.94 - 11.7;P = 0.06]。
黏液性或管状/筛状乳腺癌女性的预后优于其他组织学类型的女性,尽管该观察基于有限数量的事件。在患有这些组织学类型疾病的绝经后女性中,来曲唑与他莫昔芬相比的优势程度在黏液性或管状/筛状疾病患者中可能没有那么大。
NCT00004205。