Nyman Samuel R, Goodwin Kelly, Kwasnicka Dominika, Callaway Andrew
a Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Psychology , Bournemouth University , Dorset , UK.
b Bournemouth University Dementia Institute, Bournemouth University , Dorset , UK.
Psychol Health. 2016;31(3):313-30. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1088014. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
Evaluations of techniques to promote physical activity usually adopt a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Such designs inform how a technique performs on average but cannot be used for treatment of individuals. Our objective was to conduct the first N-of-1 RCTs of behaviour change techniques with older people and test the effectiveness of the techniques for increasing walking within individuals.
Eight adults aged 60-87 were randomised to a 2 (goal-setting vs. active control) × 2 (self-monitoring vs. active control) factorial RCT over 62 days. The time series data were analysed for each single case using linear regressions.
Walking was objectively measured using pedometers.
Compared to control days, goal-setting increased walking in 4 out of 8 individuals and self-monitoring increased walking in 7 out of 8 individuals. While the probability for self-monitoring to be effective in 7 out of 8 participants was beyond chance (p = .03), no intervention effect was significant for individual participants. Two participants had a significant but small linear decrease in walking over time.
We demonstrate the utility of N-of-1 trials for advancing scientific enquiry of behaviour change and in practice for increasing older people's physical activity.
促进身体活动的技术评估通常采用随机对照试验(RCT)。此类设计能说明一项技术的平均表现,但不能用于个体治疗。我们的目标是开展针对老年人的行为改变技术的首例单病例随机对照试验,并测试这些技术对增加个体步行量的有效性。
8名年龄在60 - 87岁的成年人被随机分配到一项为期62天的2(目标设定与积极对照)×2(自我监测与积极对照)析因随机对照试验中。使用线性回归对每个单病例的时间序列数据进行分析。
使用计步器客观测量步行情况。
与对照日相比,目标设定使8名个体中的4名步行量增加,自我监测使8名个体中的7名步行量增加。虽然自我监测在8名参与者中的7名中有效的概率超出偶然范围(p = 0.03),但对个体参与者而言,没有干预效果是显著的。两名参与者的步行量随时间呈显著但微小的线性下降。
我们证明了单病例试验在推进行为改变科学探究以及在实践中增加老年人身体活动方面的效用。