Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
VA Center for Clinical Management Research and University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):e123-e130. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.11.011. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
Despite evidence that regular physical activity confers health benefits, physical activity rates among older adults remain low. Both personal and social goals may enhance older adults' motivation to become active. This study tested the effects of financial incentives, donations to charity, and the combined effects of both interventions on older adults' uptake and retention of increased levels of walking.
RCT comparing three interventions to control. Data collection occurred from 2012 to 2013. Analyses were conducted in 2013-2016.
Ninety-four adults aged ≥65 years from Philadelphia-area retirement communities.
All participants received digital pedometers, walking goals of a 50% increase in daily steps, and weekly feedback on goal attainment. Participants were randomized to one of four groups: (1) Control: received weekly feedback only; (2) Financial Incentives: received payment of $20 each week walking goals were met; (3) Social Goals: received donation of $20 to a charity of choice each week walking goals were met; and (4) Combined: received $20 each week walking goals were met that could be received by participant, donated to a charity of choice, or divided between the participant and charity.
Mean proportion of days walking goals were met during the 16-week intervention and 4-week follow-up period.
After adjusting for baseline walking, the proportion of days step goals were met during the 16-week intervention period was higher in all intervention groups versus controls (relative risk, 3.71; 95% CI=1.37, 10.01). During the 4-week follow up period, the proportion of days step goals were met did not differ in intervention groups compared to control (relative risk, 2.91; 95% CI=0.62, 13.64).
Incentive schemes that use donations to a charity of choice, personal financial incentives, or a combination of the two can each increase older adults' initial uptake of increased levels of walking.
This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01643538.
尽管有证据表明定期进行身体活动有益健康,但老年人的身体活动率仍然很低。个人和社会目标都可以增强老年人参与活动的积极性。本研究测试了经济激励、慈善捐款以及这两种干预措施相结合对老年人增加步行量的参与和保留率的影响。
与对照组相比,RCT 比较了三种干预措施。数据收集于 2012 年至 2013 年进行。分析于 2013-2016 年进行。
来自费城地区退休社区的 94 名年龄≥65 岁的成年人。
所有参与者都收到数字计步器、每天增加 50%步数的目标和每周关于目标实现的反馈。参与者被随机分配到四个组之一:(1)对照组:仅收到每周反馈;(2)经济激励组:每达到每周目标,获得 20 美元的报酬;(3)社会目标组:每达到每周目标,获得 20 美元的慈善捐款;(4)综合组:每达到每周目标,获得 20 美元,可由参与者领取、捐赠给选定的慈善机构,或在参与者和慈善机构之间分配。
在 16 周干预和 4 周随访期间,达到每日目标的天数的平均比例。
在调整基线步行后,与对照组相比,所有干预组在 16 周干预期间达到目标的天数比例均较高(相对风险,3.71;95%CI=1.37,10.01)。在 4 周随访期间,干预组与对照组相比,达到目标的天数比例无差异(相对风险,2.91;95%CI=0.62,13.64)。
使用选择的慈善机构捐款、个人经济激励或两者结合的激励计划都可以提高老年人对增加步行量的初始参与度。
本研究在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,NCT01643538。