Gentier Romina J, van Leeuwen Fred W
Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Mol Neurosci. 2015 Sep 2;8:47. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2015.00047. eCollection 2015.
Amyloid β (Aβ) plaque formation is a prominent cellular hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). To date, immunization trials in AD patients have not been effective in terms of curing or ameliorating dementia. In addition, γ-secretase inhibitor strategies await clinical improvements in AD. These approaches were based upon the idea that autosomal dominant mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Presenilin 1 (PS1) genes are predictive for treatment of all AD patients. However most AD patients are of the sporadic form which partly explains the failures to treat this multifactorial disease. The major risk factor for developing sporadic AD (SAD) is aging whereas the Apolipoprotein E polymorphism (ε4 variant) is the most prominent genetic risk factor. Other medium-risk factors such as triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) and nine low risk factors from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) were associated with AD. Recently, pooled GWAS studies identified protein ubiquitination as one of the key modulators of AD. In addition, a brain site specific strategy was used to compare the proteomes of AD patients by an Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. This strategy revealed numerous proteins that strongly interact with ubiquitin (UBB) signaling, and pointing to a dysfunctional ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) as a causal factor in AD. We reported that DNA-RNA sequence differences in several genes including ubiquitin do occur in AD, the resulting misframed protein of which accumulates in the neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). This suggests again a functional link between neurodegeneration of the AD type and loss of protein quality control by the UPS. Progress in this field is discussed and modulating the activity of the UPS opens an attractive avenue of research towards slowing down the development of AD and ameliorating its effects by discovering prime targets for AD therapeutics.
淀粉样β(Aβ)斑块形成是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的一个显著细胞特征。迄今为止,针对AD患者的免疫治疗试验在治愈或改善痴呆方面尚未取得成效。此外,γ-分泌酶抑制剂策略仍有待在AD治疗中取得临床进展。这些方法基于这样一种观点,即淀粉样前体蛋白(APP)和早老素1(PS1)基因的常染色体显性突变可预测所有AD患者的治疗效果。然而,大多数AD患者为散发性,这在一定程度上解释了治疗这种多因素疾病的失败。散发性AD(SAD)发展的主要风险因素是衰老,而载脂蛋白E多态性(ε4变体)是最突出的遗传风险因素。其他中等风险因素,如髓样细胞2上表达的触发受体(TREM2)以及全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中的九个低风险因素,也与AD相关。最近,汇总的GWAS研究确定蛋白质泛素化是AD的关键调节因子之一。此外,采用了一种脑区特异性策略,通过 Ingenuity 通路分析比较AD患者的蛋白质组。该策略揭示了许多与泛素(UBB)信号强烈相互作用的蛋白质,并指出功能失调的泛素蛋白酶体系统(UPS)是AD的一个致病因素。我们报道,包括泛素在内的几个基因中的DNA - RNA序列差异确实在AD中出现,由此产生的错误框定蛋白会在神经原纤维缠结(NFTs)中积累。这再次表明AD型神经退行性变与UPS导致的蛋白质质量控制丧失之间存在功能联系。本文讨论了该领域的进展,调节UPS的活性为减缓AD的发展并通过发现AD治疗的主要靶点来改善其影响开辟了一条有吸引力的研究途径。