Jansen Willemijn J, Ossenkoppele Rik, Knol Dirk L, Tijms Betty M, Scheltens Philip, Verhey Frans R J, Visser Pieter Jelle, Aalten Pauline, Aarsland Dag, Alcolea Daniel, Alexander Myriam, Almdahl Ina S, Arnold Steven E, Baldeiras Inês, Barthel Henryk, van Berckel Bart N M, Bibeau Kristen, Blennow Kaj, Brooks David J, van Buchem Mark A, Camus Vincent, Cavedo Enrica, Chen Kewei, Chetelat Gael, Cohen Ann D, Drzezga Alexander, Engelborghs Sebastiaan, Fagan Anne M, Fladby Tormod, Fleisher Adam S, van der Flier Wiesje M, Ford Lisa, Förster Stefan, Fortea Juan, Foskett Nadia, Frederiksen Kristian S, Freund-Levi Yvonne, Frisoni Giovanni B, Froelich Lutz, Gabryelewicz Tomasz, Gill Kiran Dip, Gkatzima Olymbia, Gómez-Tortosa Estrella, Gordon Mark Forrest, Grimmer Timo, Hampel Harald, Hausner Lucrezia, Hellwig Sabine, Herukka Sanna-Kaisa, Hildebrandt Helmut, Ishihara Lianna, Ivanoiu Adrian, Jagust William J, Johannsen Peter, Kandimalla Ramesh, Kapaki Elisabeth, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec Aleksandra, Klunk William E, Köhler Sebastian, Koglin Norman, Kornhuber Johannes, Kramberger Milica G, Van Laere Koen, Landau Susan M, Lee Dong Young, de Leon Mony, Lisetti Viviana, Lleó Alberto, Madsen Karine, Maier Wolfgang, Marcusson Jan, Mattsson Niklas, de Mendonça Alexandre, Meulenbroek Olga, Meyer Philipp T, Mintun Mark A, Mok Vincent, Molinuevo José Luis, Møllergård Hanne M, Morris John C, Mroczko Barbara, Van der Mussele Stefan, Na Duk L, Newberg Andrew, Nordberg Agneta, Nordlund Arto, Novak Gerald P, Paraskevas George P, Parnetti Lucilla, Perera Gayan, Peters Oliver, Popp Julius, Prabhakar Sudesh, Rabinovici Gil D, Ramakers Inez H G B, Rami Lorena, Resende de Oliveira Catarina, Rinne Juha O, Rodrigue Karen M, Rodríguez-Rodríguez Eloy, Roe Catherine M, Rot Uros, Rowe Christopher C, Rüther Eckart, Sabri Osama, Sanchez-Juan Páscual, Santana Isabel, Sarazin Marie, Schröder Johannes, Schütte Christin, Seo Sang W, Soetewey Femke, Soininen Hilkka, Spiru Luiza, Struyfs Hanne, Teunissen Charlotte E, Tsolaki Magda, Vandenberghe Rik, Verbeek Marcel M, Villemagne Victor L, Vos Stephanie J B, van Waalwijk van Doorn Linda J C, Waldemar Gunhild, Wallin Anders, Wallin Åsa K, Wiltfang Jens, Wolk David A, Zboch Marzena, Zetterberg Henrik
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the.
JAMA. 2015 May 19;313(19):1924-38. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.4668.
Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early pathological event in Alzheimer disease (AD), starting decades before dementia onset. Estimates of the prevalence of amyloid pathology in persons without dementia are needed to understand the development of AD and to design prevention studies.
To use individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of amyloid pathology as measured with biomarkers in participants with normal cognition, subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Relevant biomarker studies identified by searching studies published before April 2015 using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases and through personal communication with investigators.
Studies were included if they provided individual participant data for participants without dementia and used an a priori defined cutoff for amyloid positivity.
Individual records were provided for 2914 participants with normal cognition, 697 with SCI, and 3972 with MCI aged 18 to 100 years from 55 studies.
Prevalence of amyloid pathology on positron emission tomography or in cerebrospinal fluid according to AD risk factors (age, apolipoprotein E [APOE] genotype, sex, and education) estimated by generalized estimating equations.
The prevalence of amyloid pathology increased from age 50 to 90 years from 10% (95% CI, 8%-13%) to 44% (95% CI, 37%-51%) among participants with normal cognition; from 12% (95% CI, 8%-18%) to 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%) among patients with SCI; and from 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) to 71% (95% CI, 66%-76%) among patients with MCI. APOE-ε4 carriers had 2 to 3 times higher prevalence estimates than noncarriers. The age at which 15% of the participants with normal cognition were amyloid positive was approximately 40 years for APOE ε4ε4 carriers, 50 years for ε2ε4 carriers, 55 years for ε3ε4 carriers, 65 years for ε3ε3 carriers, and 95 years for ε2ε3 carriers. Amyloid positivity was more common in highly educated participants but not associated with sex or biomarker modality.
Among persons without dementia, the prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology as determined by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid findings was associated with age, APOE genotype, and presence of cognitive impairment. These findings suggest a 20- to 30-year interval between first development of amyloid positivity and onset of dementia.
脑淀粉样β蛋白聚集是阿尔茨海默病(AD)早期的病理事件,在痴呆症发病前数十年就已开始。需要了解无痴呆症人群中淀粉样病理的患病率,以理解AD的发展并设计预防研究。
采用个体参与者数据荟萃分析,估计认知正常、主观认知障碍(SCI)或轻度认知障碍(MCI)参与者中通过生物标志物测量的淀粉样病理患病率。
通过检索2015年4月之前发表的研究(使用MEDLINE和科学网数据库)以及与研究人员的个人交流确定相关生物标志物研究。
纳入那些为无痴呆症参与者提供个体参与者数据,并使用预先定义的淀粉样蛋白阳性临界值的研究。
从55项研究中为2914名18至100岁认知正常的参与者、697名患有SCI的参与者以及3972名患有MCI的参与者提供了个体记录。
根据AD危险因素(年龄、载脂蛋白E [APOE] 基因型、性别和教育程度),通过广义估计方程估计正电子发射断层扫描或脑脊液中淀粉样病理的患病率。
认知正常的参与者中,淀粉样病理的患病率从50岁时的10%(95%CI,8% - 13%)增加到90岁时的44%(95%CI,37% - 51%);患有SCI的患者中,患病率从12%(95%CI,8% - 18%)增加到43%(95%CI,32% - 55%);患有MCI的患者中,患病率从27%(95%CI,23% - 32%)增加到71%(95%CI,66% - 76%)。APOE-ε4携带者的患病率估计是非携带者的2至3倍。对于认知正常的参与者,15%为淀粉样蛋白阳性的年龄,APOE ε4ε4携带者约为40岁,ε2ε4携带者约为50岁,ε3ε4携带者约为55岁,ε3ε3携带者约为65岁,ε2ε3携带者约为95岁。淀粉样蛋白阳性在受教育程度高的参与者中更常见,但与性别或生物标志物检测方式无关。
在无痴呆症人群中,通过正电子发射断层扫描或脑脊液检查结果确定的脑淀粉样病理患病率与年龄、APOE基因型和认知障碍的存在有关。这些发现表明,淀粉样蛋白阳性首次出现与痴呆症发病之间间隔20至30年。