Khemani Robinder G, Hotz Justin, Morzov Rica, Flink Rutger, Kamerkar Asavari, Ross Patrick A, Newth Christopher J L
1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
2 Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 15;193(2):198-209. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201506-1064OC.
Subglottic edema is the most common cause of pediatric extubation failure, but few studies have confirmed risk factors or prevention strategies. This may be due to subjective assessment of stridor or inability to differentiate supraglottic from subglottic disease.
Objective 1 was to assess the utility of calibrated respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) and esophageal manometry to identify clinically significant post-extubation upper airway obstruction (UAO) and differentiate subglottic from supraglottic UAO. Objective 2 was to identify risk factors for subglottic UAO, stratified by cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs).
We conducted a single-center prospective study of children receiving mechanical ventilation. UAO was defined by inspiratory flow limitation (measured by RIP and esophageal manometry) and classified as subglottic or supraglottic based on airway maneuver response. Clinicians performed simultaneous blinded clinical UAO assessment at the bedside.
A total of 409 children were included, 98 of whom had post-extubation UAO and 49 (12%) of whom were subglottic. The reintubation rate was 34 (8.3%) of 409, with 14 (41%) of these 34 attributable to subglottic UAO. Five minutes after extubation, RIP and esophageal manometry better identified patients who subsequently received UAO treatment than clinical UAO assessment (P < 0.006). Risk factors independently associated with subglottic UAO included low cuff leak volume or high preextubation leak pressure, poor sedation, and preexisting UAO (P < 0.04) for cuffed ETTs; and age (range, 1 mo to 5 yr) for uncuffed ETTs (P < 0.04). For uncuffed ETTs, the presence or absence of preextubation leak was not associated with subglottic UAO.
RIP and esophageal manometry can objectively identify subglottic UAO after extubation. Using this technique, preextubation leak pressures or cuff leak volumes predict subglottic UAO in children, but only if the ETT is cuffed.
声门下水肿是小儿拔管失败的最常见原因,但很少有研究证实其危险因素或预防策略。这可能是由于对喘鸣的主观评估或无法区分声门上与声门下疾病。
目标1是评估校准呼吸感应体积描记法(RIP)和食管测压法在识别临床上显著的拔管后上气道梗阻(UAO)以及区分声门下与声门上UAO方面的效用。目标2是确定声门下UAO的危险因素,并根据带套囊与不带套囊气管内插管(ETT)进行分层。
我们对接受机械通气的儿童进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究。UAO通过吸气流量限制(通过RIP和食管测压法测量)来定义,并根据气道操作反应分为声门下或声门上。临床医生在床边同时进行盲法临床UAO评估。
共纳入409名儿童,其中98名有拔管后UAO,49名(12%)为声门下UAO。再插管率为409名中的34名(8.3%),这34名中的14名(41%)归因于声门下UAO。拔管后5分钟,RIP和食管测压法比临床UAO评估能更好地识别随后接受UAO治疗的患者(P < 0.006)。与声门下UAO独立相关的危险因素包括带套囊ETT的套囊漏气量低或拔管前漏气压力高、镇静效果差以及既往存在UAO(P < 0.04);不带套囊ETT的危险因素为年龄(范围1个月至5岁)(P < 0.04)。对于不带套囊的ETT,拔管前有无漏气与声门下UAO无关。
RIP和食管测压法可客观识别拔管后的声门下UAO。使用该技术,拔管前漏气压力或套囊漏气量可预测儿童声门下UAO,但仅适用于带套囊的ETT。