Department of Population, Family & Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA Center for Child and Community Health Research, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sex Transm Infect. 2016 Jun;92(4):276-8. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052157. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
Qualitative research suggests that young women's relationships with the biological fathers of their children (BFRs), known colloquially as 'baby daddy' relationships, enable risk for pregnancy and STI/HIV. Our study compared partner characteristics and sexual risk within dyads based on BFR, among a sample of young women in Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
We conducted secondary analysis of survey data collected in 2011-2013 from heterosexually experienced youth ages 15-24 in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Analyses are limited to women with at least one recent (past 6 months) sex partner (n=171 participants, reporting on 271 relationships). Using generalised estimating equations with logit function for correlated binary responses, we evaluate associations of BFR with partner characteristics, sexual risk behaviour and contraceptive non-use.
At least one BFR partner was reported by 25.2%. Male partners in BFRs were more likely to have been incarcerated or arrested. BFRs were more often characterised by women as 'main' versus 'casual' partners (adjusted OR (AOR) 3.92, 95% CI 1.19 to 12.9). In adjusted analyses, BFR was associated with condom non-use for vaginal (AOR 12.3, 95% CI 3.92 to 38.7) and anal (AOR 3.32, 95% CI 1.34 to 8.22) intercourse. While BFR was associated with contraceptive non-use (AOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.84), this association attenuated to non-significance after adjusting for partnership type (AOR 2.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 4.67).
While few differences in BFR partner characteristics emerged, significantly greater risk for unprotected intercourse was identified within BFR relationships. Findings suggest that the relationship context of a shared child heightens sexual risk for the young women most affected by STI.
定性研究表明,年轻女性与孩子生父(通常称为“孩子爸爸”)的关系会增加怀孕和性传播感染/艾滋病的风险。我们的研究比较了马里兰州巴尔的摩市一组年轻女性中,根据生物父亲关系,在伴侣特征和双性关系内的性风险。
我们对 2011 年至 2013 年期间在美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市进行的一项异性恋经验青少年调查数据进行了二次分析,年龄在 15 至 24 岁之间。分析仅限于至少有一个最近(过去 6 个月)性伴侣的女性(n=171 名参与者,报告了 271 段关系)。使用广义估计方程和逻辑函数进行相关二元反应,我们评估了生物父亲关系与伴侣特征、性风险行为和避孕失败的关系。
至少有一个生物父亲关系的报告率为 25.2%。在生物父亲关系中,男性伴侣更有可能被监禁或被捕。生物父亲关系中,女性更倾向于将其描述为“主要”而非“偶然”的伴侣(调整后的比值比(AOR)为 3.92,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.19 至 12.9)。在调整后的分析中,生物父亲关系与阴道(AOR 12.3,95%CI 3.92 至 38.7)和肛门(AOR 3.32,95%CI 1.34 至 8.22)性交时的避孕套使用失败有关。虽然生物父亲关系与避孕失败(AOR 2.21,95%CI 1.01 至 4.84)有关,但在调整伴侣关系类型后,这种关联减弱到无统计学意义(AOR 2.06,95%CI 0.91 至 4.67)。
虽然生物父亲关系中伴侣特征的差异不大,但在生物父亲关系中,未采取保护措施的性行为风险显著增加。研究结果表明,共同孩子的关系背景增加了最受性传播感染影响的年轻女性的性风险。