• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝硬化患者肝细胞癌单纯腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究

Outcomes of Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: A Case-Control Study with Propensity Score Matching.

作者信息

Tanaka Shogo, Takemura Shigekazu, Shinkawa Hiroji, Nishioka Takayoshi, Hamano Genya, Kinoshita Masahiko, Ito Tokuji, Kubo Shoji

机构信息

Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Eur Surg Res. 2015 Dec;55(4):291-301. doi: 10.1159/000439274. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1159/000439274
PMID:26394136
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic hepatic resection (LH) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has gradually gained ground as a safe and minimally invasive treatment, although LH for cirrhotic patients remains challenging.

METHODS

Between January 2007 and August 2014, 28 and 57 patients with histologically proven cirrhosis (histological activity index, fibrosis score 4) underwent pure LH and open hepatic resection (OH; less than segmentectomy), respectively, for peripheral HCC ≤5 cm. To correct the difference in clinicopathological factors, including difficulty scores, between the two groups, propensity score matching was used at a 1:1 ratio, which resulted in a comparison of 20 patients per group. We compared the short- and long-term outcomes of LH and OH to investigate the efficacy of LH.

RESULTS

Clinicopathological variables, including difficulty scores, were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of complications and mean intraoperative blood loss were lower in the LH group than the OH group (0 vs. 45% and 180 vs. 440 ml, p = 0.001 and 0.04, respectively). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 42% in the LH group and 30% in the OH group (p = 0.533), whereas the 5-year overall survival rates were 46 and 60%, respectively (p = 0.606).

CONCLUSIONS

LH is a safe and effective treatment option for cirrhotic patients with HCC in terms of intraoperative blood loss and morbidity.

摘要

背景/目的:尽管对肝硬化患者进行腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)仍具有挑战性,但作为一种安全且微创的治疗方法,用于肝细胞癌(HCC)的LH已逐渐得到认可。

方法

在2007年1月至2014年8月期间,分别有28例和57例经组织学证实为肝硬化(组织学活动指数,纤维化评分4)的患者接受了单纯LH和开放性肝切除术(OH;小于肝段切除术),用于治疗直径≤5 cm的周围型HCC。为校正两组间包括难度评分在内的临床病理因素差异,采用1:1比例的倾向评分匹配,最终每组比较20例患者。我们比较了LH和OH的短期和长期结果,以研究LH的疗效。

结果

两组间包括难度评分在内的临床病理变量均衡良好。LH组的并发症发生率和平均术中失血量低于OH组(分别为0%对45%和180 ml对440 ml,p分别为0.001和0.04)。LH组的3年无病生存率为42%,OH组为30%(p = 0.533),而5年总生存率分别为46%和60%(p = 0.606)。

结论

就术中失血量和发病率而言,LH是肝硬化HCC患者的一种安全有效的治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of Pure Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: A Case-Control Study with Propensity Score Matching.肝硬化患者肝细胞癌单纯腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究
Eur Surg Res. 2015 Dec;55(4):291-301. doi: 10.1159/000439274. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
2
Comparison of short-term outcomes in laparoscopic vs open hepatectomy.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术的短期疗效比较。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):941-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1023.
3
Outcomes of laparoscopic hepatic resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma located at the liver surface: A case-control study with propensity score matching.腹腔镜肝切除术与经皮射频消融治疗位于肝脏表面的肝细胞癌的疗效:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Hepatol Res. 2016 May;46(6):565-74. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12592. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
4
Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures.拥有超过500例微创肝脏手术的经验。
Ann Surg. 2008 Sep;248(3):475-86. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318185e647.
5
Long-term survival analysis of pure laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: a single-center experience.长期生存分析:腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的比较:单中心经验。
Ann Surg. 2013 Mar;257(3):506-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b947a.
6
Repeated Hepatic Resection versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Hepatic Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Study.再次肝切除与射频消融治疗肝切除后复发性肝细胞癌:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):599-608. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141568. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma comorbid with cirrhosis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗合并肝硬化的肝细胞癌的疗效与安全性
Prz Gastroenterol. 2020;15(3):225-233. doi: 10.5114/pg.2020.99039. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
8
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis: a single-center propensity score matching analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化合并肝细胞癌:单中心倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Dec;9(23):1733. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-5833.
9
Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience.小肝癌患者行肝段切除术或肝叶切除术:20 年经验回顾
Surgery. 2010 May;147(5):676-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.043. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
10
Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and open liver resection after propensity matching selection.倾向评分匹配选择后腹腔镜与开腹肝切除的临床比较
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):573-87. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.031. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Surgical Management and Evolving Therapies.肝细胞癌:手术治疗与不断发展的治疗策略。
Cancer Treat Res. 2024;192:185-206. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61238-1_10.
2
EAES/SAGES evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus on optimization of perioperative care in older adults.EAES/SAGES 关于优化老年人围手术期护理的循证建议和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4104-4126. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10977-7. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Significance of Prediction Models for Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure Based on Type IV Collagen 7s Domain in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
基于IV型胶原7s结构域的预测模型对肝细胞癌患者肝切除术后肝衰竭的意义
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 20;16(10):1938. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101938.
4
Positioning of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From Laparoscopic to Robot-Assisted Liver Resection.肝细胞癌微创肝脏手术的定位:从腹腔镜肝脏切除到机器人辅助肝脏切除
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 12;15(2):488. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020488.
5
Surgical Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Class B: a Retrospective Multicenter Study.Child-Pugh B级患者肝细胞癌的手术结局:一项回顾性多中心研究
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Feb;27(2):283-295. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05549-w. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Comparison of survival and post-operation outcomes for minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies.肝细胞癌微创与开放肝切除术的生存及术后结局比较:病例匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 20;12:1021804. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021804. eCollection 2022.
7
Laparoscopic liver resection reduces postoperative infection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-based analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术降低肝细胞癌患者术后感染率:基于倾向评分的分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9194-9203. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09403-7. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Superiority of laparoscopic liver resection to open liver resection in obese individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study.肥胖肝细胞癌患者行腹腔镜肝切除与开腹肝切除的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Sep 16;6(1):135-148. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12506. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Survival analysis between laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on reconstructed time-to-event data.基于重建时间事件数据的腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的生存分析:荟萃分析。
Hepatol Int. 2021 Oct;15(5):1215-1235. doi: 10.1007/s12072-021-10219-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
10
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis of Case-Matched Studies.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹手术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的疗效:病例匹配研究的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 May 7;11:652272. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652272. eCollection 2021.