Suppr超能文献

基于市场的创新型废物管理政策工具:比利时碎纸机残渣案例研究

Innovative market-based policy instruments for waste management: A case study on shredder residues in Belgium.

作者信息

Dubois Maarten, Hoogmartens Rob, Van Passel Steven, Van Acker Karel, Vanderreydt Ive

机构信息

Policy Research Centre for Sustainable Materials, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Policy Research Centre for Sustainable Materials, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Center for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2015 Oct;33(10):886-93. doi: 10.1177/0734242X15600053.

Abstract

In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs.

摘要

在日益复杂的废物市场中,基于市场的政策工具,如处置税,能够激励可持续发展,同时为创新留出灵活性空间。然而,处置税的实施往往遭到生活垃圾处理商的批评,他们担心会在与其他国家竞争对手的竞争中处于劣势。本文讨论了三种创新型基于市场的工具,这些工具可限制对国际竞争力的影响:可交易回收信用、退还处置税和差异化处置税。这三种工具在欧洲均已被用于不同的环境政策。为了说明这些工具如何用于废物政策,本文通过对比利时含金属废物流中的碎料残渣进行案例研究,对文献综述进行补充。分析表明,传统处置税仍是最有效、简单且透明的工具。然而,如果国际竞争是一个重大问题,或者政治支持薄弱,退还处置税和差异化处置税作为次优工具可能具有附加价值。可交易回收信用不适用于具有市场支配力的小型废物市场。此外,退还税会产生类似的激励作用,但会降低交易成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验