Suppr超能文献

一夫一妻制和双方自愿非一夫一妻制性伴侣的性健康史及行为比较。

A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners.

作者信息

Lehmiller Justin J

机构信息

Department of Counseling Psychology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2022-8. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12987. Epub 2015 Sep 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although consensually nonmonogamous (CNM) relationships are presumed to be far riskier for partners' sexual health compared with monogamous relationships, the disparity between them may be smaller than assumed. A growing body of research finds that many partners who have made monogamy agreements cheat, and when they do, they are less likely to practice safe sex than CNM partners.

AIM

Extant comparisons of monogamous and CNM relationships are rare and have yet to establish whether rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and STI testing differ between these groups. The present research compared self-reported STI history, lifetime number of sex partners, and condom use practices among monogamous and CNM partners.

METHODS

Participants (N = 556) were recruited for an online survey of "attitudes toward sexual relationships." Approximately two-thirds of the sample reported current involvement in a monogamous relationship, with the remainder indicating involvement in a CNM relationship.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All participants completed a questionnaire that included measures of condom use practices with primary and extra-pair partners, as well as their STI history.

RESULTS

CNM partners reported more lifetime sexual partners than individuals in monogamous relationships. In addition, compared with monogamous partners, CNM partners were more likely to (i) report using condoms during intercourse with their primary partner; (ii) report using condoms during intercourse with extradyadic partners; and (iii) report having been tested for STIs. Approximately one-quarter of monogamous partners reported sex outside of their primary relationship, most of whom indicated that their primary partner did not know about their infidelity. The percentage of participants reporting previous STI diagnoses did not differ across relationship type.

CONCLUSIONS

CNM partners reported taking more precautions than those in monogamous relationships in terms of greater condom use during intercourse with all partners and a higher likelihood of STI testing. Thus, although persons in CNM relationships had more sexual partners, the precautions they took did not appear to elevate their rate of STIs above an imperfect implementation of monogamy. Lehmiller JJ. A comparison of sexual health history and practices among monogamous and consensually nonmonogamous sexual partners.

摘要

引言

尽管人们普遍认为,与一夫一妻制关系相比,双方自愿的非一夫一妻制(CNM)关系对伴侣的性健康风险要高得多,但两者之间的差距可能比想象的要小。越来越多的研究发现,许多签订了一夫一妻制协议的伴侣会出轨,而且当他们出轨时,他们进行安全性行为的可能性比实行CNM的伴侣要小。

目的

目前对一夫一妻制和CNM关系的比较很少,尚未确定这些群体之间性传播感染(STI)的发生率和STI检测率是否存在差异。本研究比较了一夫一妻制和CNM伴侣自我报告的性传播感染病史、终生性伴侣数量以及避孕套使用情况。

方法

招募了556名参与者进行一项关于“对性关系的态度”的在线调查。大约三分之二的样本报告目前处于一夫一妻制关系中,其余样本表示处于CNM关系中。

主要观察指标

所有参与者都完成了一份问卷,其中包括与主要伴侣和非主要伴侣使用避孕套情况的测量,以及他们的性传播感染病史。

结果

CNM伴侣报告的终生性伴侣比一夫一妻制关系中的个体更多。此外,与一夫一妻制伴侣相比,CNM伴侣更有可能:(i)报告在与主要伴侣性交时使用避孕套;(ii)报告在与非主要伴侣性交时使用避孕套;(iii)报告接受过性传播感染检测。大约四分之一的一夫一妻制伴侣报告在主要关系之外有性行为,其中大多数人表示他们的主要伴侣不知道他们的不忠行为。不同关系类型的参与者报告既往性传播感染诊断的百分比没有差异。

结论

CNM伴侣报告采取了更多的预防措施,在与所有伴侣性交时更多地使用避孕套,接受性传播感染检测的可能性也更高。因此,尽管处于CNM关系中的人有更多的性伴侣,但他们采取的预防措施似乎并没有使他们的性传播感染率高于一夫一妻制未完美实行的情况。莱米勒·J·J。一夫一妻制和双方自愿的非一夫一妻制性伴侣的性健康史及行为比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验