Suppr超能文献

创伤性供体死因是否会影响肺移植后的结果?单中心分析。

Does Traumatic Donor Cause of Death Influence Outcome after Lung Transplantation? A Single-Centre Analysis.

作者信息

Pilarczyk Kevin, Heckmann Jens, Carstens Henning, Lubarski Jura, Jakob Heinz, Pizanis Nikolaus, Kamler Markus

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Imland Klinik Rendsburg, Rendsburg, Germany.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;65(5):395-402. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1564447. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

Abstract

Owing to the shortage of donor organs in lung transplantation (LuTX), liberalization of donor selection criteria has been proposed. However, some studies suggested that donor traumatic brain damage might influence posttransplantation allograft function. This article aimed to investigate the association of donor cause of death (DCD) and outcome after LuTX.  A retrospective analysis of 186 consecutive double LuTXs at our institution from January 2000 to December 2008 was performed. DCD was categorized into traumatic brain injury (TBI) and nontraumatic brain injury (NTBI). In addition, NTBI was sub classified as spontaneous intracerebral bleeding (B), hypoxic brain damage (H), and intracerebral neoplasia (N).  DCD was classified as TBI in 50 patients (26.9%) and NTBI in 136 patients (73.1%): B in 112 patients (60.2%), H in 21 patients (11.3%), and N in 3 patients (1.6%). Young male donors predominated in group TBI (mean age 36.0 ± 14.5 vs. 42.8 ± 10.7,  < 0.01; 29 males in the TBI group [58.0%] vs. 48 males in the NTBI group [35.3%],  < 0.01). Groups of DCD did not differ significantly by recipient age or gender, recipient diagnosis, donor ventilation time, or paO/FiO before harvesting. TBI donors received significantly more blood (3.4 ± 3.8 vs. 1.8 ± 1.9,  = 0.03). A chest trauma was evident only in group T ( = 7 [3.7%] vs. 0 [0%],  < 0.001). Mode of donor death did not affect the following indices of graft function: length of postoperative ventilation, paO/FiO ratio up to 48 hours, and lung function up to 36 months. One- and three-year survival was comparable with 84.4 and 70.4% for TBI donors versus 89.4% and 69.2% for NTBI donors. Five-year survival tended to be lower in the TBI group but did not reach statistical significance (43.4 vs. 53.9%).  This study indicates that DCD does not affect outcome after LuTX. These results can be achieved with an ideal donor management combined with an individual case-to-case evaluation by an experienced LuTX surgeon.

摘要

由于肺移植(LuTX)中供体器官短缺,有人提出放宽供体选择标准。然而,一些研究表明供体创伤性脑损伤可能会影响移植后同种异体移植物的功能。本文旨在研究肺移植后供体死亡原因(DCD)与预后的关系。

对2000年1月至2008年12月在本机构连续进行的186例双侧肺移植进行回顾性分析。DCD分为创伤性脑损伤(TBI)和非创伤性脑损伤(NTBI)。此外,NTBI又细分为自发性脑出血(B)、缺氧性脑损伤(H)和脑内肿瘤(N)。

50例患者(26.9%)的DCD分类为TBI,136例患者(73.1%)为NTBI:B组112例患者(60.2%),H组21例患者(11.3%),N组3例患者(1.6%)。TBI组年轻男性供体占主导(平均年龄36.0±14.5岁对42.8±10.7岁,<0.01;TBI组29例男性[58.0%]对NTBI组48例男性[35.3%],<0.01)。DCD组在受者年龄或性别、受者诊断、供体通气时间或采集前的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数方面无显著差异。TBI供体接受的血液明显更多(3.4±3.8对1.8±1.9,P = 0.03)。仅在T组有明显的胸部创伤(7例[3.7%]对0例[0%],P < 0.001)。供体死亡方式不影响以下移植物功能指标:术后通气时间、48小时内的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数比值以及36个月内的肺功能。TBI供体的1年和3年生存率分别为84.4%和70.4%,与NTBI供体的89.4%和69.2%相当。TBI组的5年生存率倾向于较低,但未达到统计学意义(43.4%对53.9%)。

本研究表明,DCD不影响肺移植后的预后。通过理想的供体管理以及经验丰富的肺移植外科医生进行的个案评估,可以取得这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验