Suppr超能文献

循环死亡供体肺移植后的短期和长期结果:单中心经验

Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation From Circulatory-Dead Donors: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Ruttens David, Martens An, Ordies Sofie, Verleden Stijn E, Neyrinck Arne P, Vos Robin, Boada Marc Collado, Vanaudenaerde Bart M, Verleden Geert M, Van Raemdonck Dirk

机构信息

1 Division of Respiratory Diseases, Lung Transplant Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, KU Leuven/UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Algology, KU Leuven/UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3 Department of Thoracic Surgery, KU Leuven/UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2017 Nov;101(11):2691-2694. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001678.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) to overcome the donor organ shortage is well accepted in the clinical setting, although long-term outcome after DCD lung transplantation (LTx) remains largely unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, DCD LTx recipients (n = 59) were compared with a cohort of donation after brain death (DBD) LTx recipients (n = 331) transplanted between February 2007 and September 2013; follow-up was until January 1, 2016. Short-term (duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, and highest primary graft dysfunction score within 72 hours) and long-term (chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free and overall survival) follow-up were compared over a median follow-up of 50.5 (±3.7) months for DCD and 66.8 (±1.5) months for DBD.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups with regard to patient characteristics: age (P = 0.78), underlying disease (P = 0.30) and type of type of LTx (P = 0.10), except sex where more males were transplanted with a DCD donor (62.7%) vs (48.3%, P = 0.048). There was no difference in time on mechanical ventilation (P = 0.59), intensive care unit stay (P = 0.74), highest primary graft dysfunction score (P = 0.67) and hospital stay (P = 0.99). Moreover, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free (P = 0.86) and overall survival (P = 0.15) did not differ between the DBD and DCD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, both short- and long-term outcomes in DCD lung recipients are comparable to that of DBD lung recipients. Therefore, DCD LTx can be considered a safe strategy that significantly increased our transplant activity.

摘要

背景

心脏死亡后捐赠(DCD)以克服供体器官短缺在临床环境中已被广泛接受,尽管DCD肺移植(LTx)后的长期结果仍 largely未知。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,将2007年2月至2013年9月期间接受DCD LTx的受者(n = 59)与一组脑死亡后捐赠(DBD)LTx受者(n = 331)进行比较;随访至2016年1月1日。对DCD组中位随访50.5(±3.7)个月、DBD组中位随访66.8(±1.5)个月的短期(机械通气时间、重症监护病房停留时间、住院时间以及72小时内的最高原发性移植物功能障碍评分)和长期(无慢性肺移植功能障碍和总体生存率)随访情况进行比较。

结果

两组在患者特征方面无差异:年龄(P = 0.78)、基础疾病(P = 0.30)和LTx类型(P = 0.10),但性别方面,接受DCD供体移植的男性更多(62.7%),而接受DBD供体移植的男性为48.3%(P = 0.048)。在机械通气时间(P = 0.59)、重症监护病房停留时间(P = 0.74)、最高原发性移植物功能障碍评分(P = 0.67)和住院时间(P = 0.99)方面无差异。此外,DBD组和DCD组在无慢性肺移植功能障碍(P = 0.86)和总体生存率(P = 0.15)方面也无差异。

结论

根据我们的经验,DCD肺移植受者的短期和长期结果与DBD肺移植受者相当。因此,DCD LTx可被视为一种安全策略,能显著增加我们的移植活动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验