Kamath B Jagannath, Saraswati V, Bansal Ankush, Pai Vishal
Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal University, India.
Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal University, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;4(4):171-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
Pelvifemoral angle has been described in early literature but the values have not been validated and no mention of distal bony point has been made.
Patients attending the Orthopaedic Outpatient in our hospital with complaints not related to the hip or knee were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included patients with history of hip pathology (Unilateral or Bilateral) and patients with Pelvis or Lower Limb fractures (Unilateral or Bilateral. Measurements were taken using a measuring tape, and angles were measured using a Goniometer Authors describe two clinical measurements of the hip joint in sagittal plane using Nelaton's line as reference for pelvis and line joining greater trochanter to 1. Superolateral pole of patella (α angle) and 2. Fibular head (β angle). Three hundred normal hips of 150 individuals were included in this study and angles were measured in supine and standing position.
Mean values of these angles (in supine and standing) were 67 ± 1° (α angle) and 51 ± 1° (β angle) in males and 72 ± 2° (α angle) and 58 ± 2° (β angle) in females. These angles are independent of age, height, weight and hence, the body mass index of a person.
Authors are describing a simple yet accurate method of quantifying the clinical pelvifemoral angle which will reflect upon the fixed flexion deformity at the hip in unilateral/bilateral pathological hip cases where other conventional methods are either unreliable or painful to perform.
早期文献中已描述了骨盆股骨角,但这些数值尚未得到验证,且未提及远端骨点。
本研究纳入了我院骨科门诊中主诉与髋部或膝部无关的患者。排除标准包括有髋部病变史(单侧或双侧)的患者以及骨盆或下肢骨折(单侧或双侧)的患者。使用卷尺进行测量,使用量角器测量角度。作者描述了在矢状面中以Nelaton线作为骨盆参考线,并将大转子与以下两点连线作为参考线来对髋关节进行两种临床测量:1. 髌骨上外侧极(α角);2. 腓骨头(β角)。本研究纳入了150名个体的300个正常髋关节,并在仰卧位和站立位测量角度。
这些角度(仰卧位和站立位)的平均值在男性中为67±1°(α角)和51±1°(β角),在女性中为72±2°(α角)和58±2°(β角)。这些角度与年龄、身高、体重无关,因此也与一个人的体重指数无关。
作者描述了一种简单而准确的量化临床骨盆股骨角的方法,该方法将反映单侧/双侧病理性髋关节病例中髋部的固定屈曲畸形,而其他传统方法要么不可靠,要么实施起来很痛苦。