Evans Scott R, Hujer Andrea M, Jiang Hongyu, Hujer Kristine M, Hall Thomas, Marzan Christine, Jacobs Michael R, Sampath Rangarajan, Ecker David J, Manca Claudia, Chavda Kalyan, Zhang Pan, Fernandez Helen, Chen Liang, Mediavilla Jose R, Hill Carol B, Perez Federico, Caliendo Angela M, Fowler Vance G, Chambers Henry F, Kreiswirth Barry N, Bonomo Robert A
Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research and the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;62(2):181-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ837. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Rapid molecular diagnostic (RMD) platforms may lead to better antibiotic use. Our objective was to develop analytical strategies to enhance the interpretation of RMDs for clinicians.
We compared the performance characteristics of 4 RMD platforms for detecting resistance against β-lactams in 72 highly resistant isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (PRIMERS I). Subsequently, 2 platforms were used in a blinded study in which a heterogeneous collection of 196 isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae (PRIMERS II) were examined. We evaluated the genotypic results as predictors of resistance or susceptibility against β-lactam antibiotics. We designed analytical strategies and graphical representations of platform performance, including discrimination summary plots and susceptibility and resistance predictive values, that are readily interpretable by practitioners to inform decision-making.
In PRIMERS I, the 4 RMD platforms detected β-lactamase (bla) genes and identified susceptibility or resistance in >95% of cases. In PRIMERS II, the 2 platforms identified susceptibility against extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems in >90% of cases; however, against piperacillin/tazobactam, susceptibility was identified in <80% of cases. Applying the analytical strategies to a population with 15% prevalence of ceftazidime-resistance and 5% imipenem-resistance, RMD platforms predicted susceptibility in >95% of cases, while prediction of resistance was 69%-73% for ceftazidime and 41%-50% for imipenem.
RMD platforms can help inform empiric β-lactam therapy in cases where bla genes are not detected and the prevalence of resistance is known. Our analysis is a first step in bridging the gap between RMDs and empiric treatment decisions.
快速分子诊断(RMD)平台可能有助于更好地使用抗生素。我们的目标是制定分析策略,以加强临床医生对RMD结果的解读。
我们比较了4种RMD平台对72株耐β-内酰胺类抗生素的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌高耐药菌株(引物I)检测耐药性的性能特征。随后,在一项盲法研究中使用了2种平台,检测了196株大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌(引物II)的异质性样本。我们评估了基因型结果作为对β-内酰胺类抗生素耐药或敏感的预测指标。我们设计了平台性能的分析策略和图形表示,包括鉴别汇总图以及敏感性和耐药性预测值,便于从业者解读以辅助决策。
在引物I中,4种RMD平台检测到β-内酰胺酶(bla)基因,并在>95%的病例中鉴定出敏感性或耐药性。在引物II中,2种平台在>90%的病例中鉴定出对超广谱头孢菌素和碳青霉烯类的敏感性;然而,对于哌拉西林/他唑巴坦,<80%的病例中鉴定出敏感性。将分析策略应用于头孢他啶耐药率为15%、亚胺培南耐药率为5%的人群,RMD平台在>95%的病例中预测为敏感,而头孢他啶耐药预测率为69%-73%,亚胺培南为41%-50%。
在未检测到bla基因且已知耐药率的情况下,RMD平台有助于指导经验性β-内酰胺治疗。我们的分析是弥合RMD与经验性治疗决策之间差距的第一步。