Suppr超能文献

无症状预激患者心律失常事件风险分层:2015 年 ACC/AHA/HRS 成人上性心动过速管理指南的系统评价:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组和心律学会的报告。

Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation: A systematic review for the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2016 Apr;13(4):e222-37. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.017. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature systematically to determine whether noninvasive or invasive risk stratification, such as with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation, reduces the risk of arrhythmic events and improves patient outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all January 1, 1970, through August 31, 2014) were searched for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies examining noninvasive or invasive risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation. Studies were rejected for low-quality design or the lack of an outcome, population, intervention, or comparator of interest or if they were written in a language other than English.

RESULTS

Of 778 citations found, 9 studies met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this paper. Of the 9 studies, 1 had a dual design-a randomized controlled trial of ablation versus no ablation in 76 patients and an uncontrolled prospective cohort of 148 additional patients-and 8 were uncontrolled prospective cohort studies (n=1,594). In studies reporting a mean age, the range was 32 to 50 years, and in studies reporting a median age, the range was 19 to 36 years. The majority of patients were male (range, 50% to 74%), and <10% had structural heart disease. In the randomized controlled trial component of the dual-design study, the 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of the incidence of arrhythmic events were 7% among patients who underwent ablation and 77% among patients who did not undergo ablation (relative risk reduction: 0.08; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 to 0.33; p<0.001). In the observational cohorts of asymptomatic patients who did not undergo catheter ablation (n=883, with follow-up ranging from 8 to 96 months), regular supraventricular tachycardia or benign atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval >250 ms) developed in 0% to 16%, malignant atrial fibrillation (shortest RR interval ≤250 ms) in 0% to 9%, and ventricular fibrillation in 0% to 2%, most of whom were children in the last case.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence suggests risk stratification with an electrophysiological study of patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation may be beneficial, along with consideration of accessory-pathway ablation in those deemed to be at high risk of future arrhythmias. Given the limitations of the existing data, well-designed and well-conducted studies are needed.

摘要

目的

系统回顾文献,以确定无症状预激患者的非侵入性或侵入性风险分层(如电生理研究)是否能降低心律失常事件风险并改善患者结局。

方法

检索 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(均为 1970 年 1 月 1 日至 2014 年 8 月 31 日)中关于无症状预激患者非侵入性或侵入性风险分层的随机对照试验和队列研究。设计质量低或缺乏感兴趣的结局、人群、干预措施或对照、或用其他语言撰写的研究被排除。

结果

共检索到 778 篇文献,9 项研究符合所有纳入标准,纳入本文。这 9 项研究中,1 项研究为消融与非消融的随机对照试验(76 例患者)和未消融的前瞻性队列研究(148 例患者)的双重设计,其余 8 项研究为前瞻性队列研究(n=1594)。报道平均年龄的研究中,年龄范围为 32 至 50 岁,报道中位年龄的研究中,年龄范围为 19 至 36 岁。大多数患者为男性(范围 50%至 74%),<10%有结构性心脏病。在双重设计研究的随机对照试验部分,消融组 5 年的 Kaplan-Meier 心律失常事件发生率为 7%,未消融组为 77%(相对风险降低:0.08;95%置信区间:0.02 至 0.33;p<0.001)。在未行导管消融的无症状患者的观察性队列研究中(n=883,随访时间 8 至 96 个月),0%至 16%出现规则性室上性心动过速或良性心房颤动(最短 RR 间期>250 ms),0%至 9%出现恶性心房颤动(最短 RR 间期≤250 ms),0%至 2%出现心室颤动,最后 1 例患者几乎均为儿童。

结论

现有证据提示,无症状预激患者的电生理研究进行风险分层可能有益,且对于那些被认为有未来发生心律失常高风险的患者,可考虑旁路消融。鉴于现有数据的局限性,需要进行精心设计和良好实施的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验