• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗前肿瘤特异性生长率作为一种时间生物标志物,可预测口咽癌的治疗失败并改善风险分层。

Pre-treatment tumor-specific growth rate as a temporal biomarker that predicts treatment failure and improves risk stratification for oropharyngeal cancer.

作者信息

Murphy Colin T, Devarajan Karthik, Wang Lora S, Mehra Ranee, Ridge John A, Fundakowski Christopher, Galloway Thomas J

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2015 Nov;51(11):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.09.001
PMID:26410020
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the relationship between tumor-specific growth rate (TSGR) and oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) outcomes in the HPV era.

METHODS/MATERIALS: Primary tumor volume differences between a diagnostic and secondary scan separated ⩾7days without interval treatment were used to estimate TSGR, defined as percent volume growth/day derived from primary tumor volume doubling time for 85 OPC patients with known p16 status and smoking pack-years managed with (chemo)radiation. Variables were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional models analyzed endpoints. Using concordance probability estimates (CPE), TSGR was incorporated into RTOG 0129 risk grouping (0129RG) to assess whether TSGR could improve prognostic accuracy.

RESULTS

Median time between scans was 35days (range 8-314). Median follow up was 26months (range 1-76). The 0129RG classification was: 56% low, 25% intermediate, and 19% high risk. Median TSGR was 0.74%/day (range 0.01-4.25) and increased with 0129RG low (0.41%), intermediate (0.57%) and high (1.23%) risk, respectively (p=0.015). TSGR independently predicted for TF (TSGR: HR (95%CI)=2.79, 1.67-4.65, p<0.001) in the Cox model. On CPE, prognostic accuracy for TF, disease-free survival and overall survival was improved when 0129RG was combined with TSGR. Dichotomizing 0129RG by median TSGR yielded no observed recurrences in low risk patients with TSGR<0.74% and demonstrated significant difference for intermediate risk (8% vs. 50% for TSGR<0.74% vs. ⩾0.74%, respectively, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor-specific growth rate correlates with increasing 0129RG and predicts treatment failure, potentially improving the prognostic strength and risk stratification of established 0129 risk groups.

摘要

目的

评估人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)时代肿瘤特异性生长率(TSGR)与口咽癌(OPC)预后之间的关系。

方法/材料:对于85例已知p16状态和吸烟包年数且接受(化疗)放疗的OPC患者,利用诊断性扫描与二次扫描之间至少间隔7天且无间隔治疗情况下的原发肿瘤体积差异来估计TSGR,TSGR定义为根据原发肿瘤体积倍增时间得出的每日体积增长率。根据情况使用Kruskal-Wallis检验或Fisher精确检验分析变量。采用对数秩检验和Cox比例模型分析终点。利用一致性概率估计(CPE),将TSGR纳入放射肿瘤学组(RTOG)0129风险分组(0129RG),以评估TSGR是否能提高预后准确性。

结果

扫描之间的中位时间为35天(范围8 - 314天)。中位随访时间为26个月(范围1 - 76个月)。0129RG分类为:低风险56%,中风险25%,高风险19%。TSGR中位数为0.74%/天(范围0.01 - 4.25),并分别随0129RG低风险(0.41%)、中风险(0.57%)和高风险(1.23%)而增加(p = 0.015)。在Cox模型中,TSGR独立预测治疗失败(TSGR:风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)= 2.79,1.67 - 4.65,p < 0.001)。在CPE方面,当0129RG与TSGR结合时,治疗失败、无病生存期和总生存期的预后准确性得到提高。按TSGR中位数对0129RG进行二分法分析,TSGR<0.74%的低风险患者未观察到复发,且中风险患者存在显著差异(TSGR<0.74%与≥0.74%时分别为8% vs. 50%,p < 0.001)。

结论

肿瘤特异性生长率与0129RG增加相关,并预测治疗失败,可能会提高既定0129风险组的预后强度和风险分层。

相似文献

1
Pre-treatment tumor-specific growth rate as a temporal biomarker that predicts treatment failure and improves risk stratification for oropharyngeal cancer.治疗前肿瘤特异性生长率作为一种时间生物标志物,可预测口咽癌的治疗失败并改善风险分层。
Oral Oncol. 2015 Nov;51(11):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
2
Impact of primary tumor-specific growth rate on treatment failure for nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancers.原发肿瘤特异性生长率对非口咽头颈部癌症治疗失败的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Oct;130(10):2378-2384. doi: 10.1002/lary.28393. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
3
Prognostic factors and survival unique to surgically treated p16+ oropharyngeal cancer.手术治疗 p16+口咽癌的独特预后因素和生存情况。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122 Suppl 2:S13-33. doi: 10.1002/lary.23493.
4
Validation of NRG oncology/RTOG-0129 risk groups for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer: Implications for risk-based therapeutic intensity trials.NRG 肿瘤学/RTOG-0129 风险组在 HPV 阳性和 HPV 阴性口咽鳞状细胞癌中的验证:对基于风险的治疗强度试验的影响。
Cancer. 2019 Jun 15;125(12):2027-2038. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32025. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
5
Bcl2 and human papilloma virus 16 as predictors of outcome following concurrent chemoradiation for advanced oropharyngeal cancer.Bcl2 和人乳头瘤病毒 16 作为预测同期放化疗治疗晚期口咽癌预后的指标。
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Apr 1;16(7):2138-46. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3185. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
6
Detailed Analysis of Clinicopathologic Factors Demonstrate Distinct Difference in Outcome and Prognostic Factors Between Surgically Treated HPV-Positive and Negative Oropharyngeal Cancer.对临床病理因素的详细分析表明,手术治疗的HPV阳性和阴性口咽癌在结局和预后因素方面存在明显差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4411-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4525-0. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
7
A let-7 microRNA polymorphism in the KRAS 3'-UTR is prognostic in oropharyngeal cancer.KRAS 3'-UTR区域中的let-7微小RNA多态性对口咽癌具有预后价值。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;38(5):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
8
Changing prognostic significance of tumor stage and nodal stage in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in the human papillomavirus era.人乳头瘤病毒时代口咽鳞癌患者肿瘤分期和淋巴结分期预后意义的变化。
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2594-602. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29402. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
9
T-category remains an important prognostic factor for oropharyngeal carcinoma in the era of human papillomavirus.在人乳头瘤病毒时代,T分期仍然是口咽癌的一个重要预后因素。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014 Oct;26(10):643-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
10
Effect of human papillomavirus on patterns of distant metastatic failure in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.人乳头瘤病毒对接受放化疗的口咽鳞状细胞癌远处转移失败模式的影响。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 May 1;141(5):457-62. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.136.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor and Nodal Disease Growth Rates in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.口咽鳞状细胞癌患者的肿瘤和淋巴结疾病生长速率
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 29;15(15):3865. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153865.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Predictive Outcomes of Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma-A Lingering Pitfall of the Long Latency.复发性鼻咽癌的临床特征及预测结果——长期潜伏期的一个持续陷阱
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 4;14(15):3795. doi: 10.3390/cancers14153795.
3
Impact of delays in radiotherapy of head and neck cancer on outcome.
头颈癌放疗延迟对治疗结果的影响。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;15(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01645-w.
4
Covid-19 guidance algorithm for advanced head and neck cancer reconstruction.晚期头颈癌重建的新冠病毒疾病指导算法
Microsurgery. 2020 Sep;40(6):724-725. doi: 10.1002/micr.30603. Epub 2020 May 22.
5
Time abides long enough for those who make use of it.时间对善于利用它的人来说足够长久。
Cancers Head Neck. 2018 Dec 19;3:11. doi: 10.1186/s41199-018-0038-4. eCollection 2018.
6
Specific growth rates calculated from CTs in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective study performed in Austria.基于头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者 CT 的特定增长率:在奥地利进行的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025359.
7
Simulation of head and neck cancer oxygenation and doubling time in a 4D cellular model with angiogenesis.头颈部癌氧合和倍增时间的 4D 细胞模型与血管生成的模拟。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 8;7(1):11037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11444-1.