• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用或不采用颈动脉内膜切除术对重度无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化进行现代医学治疗。

Modern medical treatment with or without carotid endarterectomy for severe asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.

作者信息

Kolos Igor, Troitskiy Alexandr, Balakhonova Tatiana, Shariya Merab, Skrypnik Denis, Tvorogova Tatiana, Deev Alexandr, Boytsov Sergey

机构信息

Department of Clinical Cardiology and Molecular Genetics, National Research Center for Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Moscow, Russian Federation.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.005
PMID:26410046
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the value of modern medical treatment (MMT) with and without carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid artery stenosis.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial involving 55 patients with 70% to 79% carotid stenosis at three Russian centers. Between 2009 and 2013, 31 patients were randomized to undergo CEA with MMT (CEA group) and 24 to receive MMT alone. The primary end point was nonfatal ipsilateral stroke or death from any cause during a follow-up period of 5.0 years. The secondary end point was any nonfatal stroke, carotid revascularization, or death from any cause during follow-up.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 3.3 years (maximum, 5.0 years). There were two primary events in the CEA group and nine events in the MMT group. The 3.3-year cumulative primary event rates were 6.5% in the CEA group and 37.5% in the MMT group (hazard ratio for the MMT group, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-16.79; P = .008). The 3.3-year cumulative secondary end point was 12.9% in the CEA group and 50.0% in the MMT group (hazard ratio for the MMT group, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-11.53; P = .0048).

CONCLUSIONS

CEA as an initial management strategy could reduce the risk of death and major cerebrovascular events when added to MMT.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了有无颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的现代医学治疗(MMT)对无症状重度颈动脉狭窄患者的价值。

方法

我们在俄罗斯的三个中心进行了一项随机试验,纳入了55例颈动脉狭窄70%至79%的患者。2009年至2013年期间,31例患者被随机分配接受CEA联合MMT(CEA组),24例患者仅接受MMT。主要终点是在5.0年的随访期内发生非致命性同侧卒中或任何原因导致的死亡。次要终点是随访期间发生的任何非致命性卒中、颈动脉血运重建或任何原因导致的死亡。

结果

中位随访3.3年(最长5.0年)后试验停止。CEA组有2例主要事件,MMT组有9例。CEA组3.3年累积主要事件发生率为6.5%,MMT组为37.5%(MMT组的风险比为5.06;95%置信区间为1.53 - 16.79;P = 0.008)。CEA组3.3年累积次要终点为12.9%,MMT组为50.0%(MMT组的风险比为4.23;95%置信区间为1.55 - 11.53;P = 0.0048)。

结论

CEA作为初始治疗策略,联合MMT时可降低死亡和重大脑血管事件的风险。

相似文献

1
Modern medical treatment with or without carotid endarterectomy for severe asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis.采用或不采用颈动脉内膜切除术对重度无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化进行现代医学治疗。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;62(4):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.005.
2
Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CaRESS) phase I clinical trial: 1-year results.使用颈动脉内膜切除术或支架系统的颈动脉血运重建术(CaRESS)I期临床试验:1年结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug;42(2):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.04.023.
3
Late outcomes after carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: insights from a propensity-matched analysis of the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的远期结果:来自减少动脉粥样硬化血栓形成以维持健康(REACH)注册研究的倾向评分匹配分析的见解。
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11):1091-100. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.933341. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Cerebral hemodynamics after contralateral carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusion: a 10-year follow-up.有症状和无症状颈动脉闭塞患者对侧颈动脉内膜切除术后的脑血流动力学:一项10年随访研究
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 Jul;26(7):899-905. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600260. Epub 2006 Jan 4.
5
Carotid endarterectomy plus medical therapy or medical therapy alone for carotid artery stenosis in symptomatic or asymptomatic patients: a meta-analysis.颈动脉内膜切除术联合药物治疗与单纯药物治疗用于症状性或无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者:一项荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):835-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.01.044. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
6
A personal experience with coronary artery bypass grafting, carotid patching, and other factors influencing the outcome of carotid endarterectomy.冠状动脉搭桥术、颈动脉修补术的个人经历以及影响颈动脉内膜切除术结果的其他因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 May;43(5):959-968. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.060.
7
Carotid artery stenting has increased rates of postprocedure stroke, death, and resource utilization than does carotid endarterectomy in the United States, 2005.在美国2005年,与颈动脉内膜切除术相比,颈动脉支架置入术增加了术后中风、死亡及资源利用的发生率。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6):1442-50, 1450.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Survival and long-term cardiovascular outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.慢性肾功能不全患者行颈动脉内膜切除术后的生存情况及长期心血管结局
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;29(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
9
Treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery disease: similar early outcomes after carotid stenting for high-risk patients and endarterectomy for standard-risk patients.无症状性颈动脉疾病的治疗:高危患者行颈动脉支架置入术与标准风险患者行内膜切除术的早期结局相似。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 May;43(5):953-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.01.008. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
10
Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly.高龄患者无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.090. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical assessment of vulnerable plaque: from histological evidence to ultrasound elastography and image-based computational patient-specific modelling.易损斑块的生物力学评估:从组织学证据到超声弹性成像及基于图像的个体化计算模型
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Mar 7;13:1478408. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1478408. eCollection 2025.
2
Joint Analysis of Cardiovascular Control and Shear Wave Elastography to Determine Carotid Plaque Vulnerability.心血管控制与剪切波弹性成像联合分析以确定颈动脉斑块易损性
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 20;14(2):648. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020648.
3
3D patient-specific modeling and structural finite element analysis of atherosclerotic carotid artery based on computed tomography angiography.
基于 CT 血管造影的粥样硬化颈动脉的 3D 患者特异性建模和结构有限元分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 14;13(1):19911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46949-5.
4
Role of Preoperative Ultrasound Shear-Wave Elastography and Radiofrequency-Based Arterial Wall Tracking in Assessing the Vulnerability of Carotid Plaques: Preliminary Results.术前超声剪切波弹性成像和基于射频的动脉壁跟踪在评估颈动脉斑块易损性中的作用:初步结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;13(4):805. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040805.
5
Carotid Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance before Treatment: 4D-Flow versus Standard 2D Imaging.治疗前颈动脉相位对比磁共振:4D-Flow 与标准 2D 成像。
Tomography. 2021 Sep 28;7(4):513-522. doi: 10.3390/tomography7040044.
6
European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis.欧洲卒中组织关于颈动脉狭窄内膜切除术和支架置入术的指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2021 Jun;6(2):I-XLVII. doi: 10.1177/23969873211012121. Epub 2021 May 11.
7
Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis in the General Population: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.一般人群无症状性颈动脉狭窄筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):487-489. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.20364.
8
Diabetic vasculopathy: macro and microvascular injury.糖尿病血管病变:大血管和微血管损伤。
Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2020 Mar;8(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s40139-020-00205-x. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Treatment strategies for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the era of lipid-lowering drugs: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.降脂药物时代无症状颈动脉狭窄的治疗策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 5;10(7):e035094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035094.
10
Role of Carotid Artery Stenting in Prevention of Stroke for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Bayesian Cross-Design and Network Meta-Analyses.颈动脉支架置入术在无症状性颈动脉狭窄卒中预防中的作用:贝叶斯交叉设计和网状荟萃分析。
Korean Circ J. 2020 Apr;50(4):330-342. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2019.0125. Epub 2020 Jan 6.