• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用QOPI评分和PDSA循环改善化疗意向沟通

Improving Communication on Intent of Chemotherapy Using QOPI Scores and PDSA Cycles.

作者信息

Bansal Meghana, Abdallah Al-Ola, Pennisi Angela, Arnaoutakis Konstantinos, Makhoul Issam, Mehta Paulette

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):736-741. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x
PMID:26411307
Abstract

Using the standardized ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) guidelines for assessing quality cancer care, we identified communication about intent of chemotherapy as an area needing improvement in our program at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) and the Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (CAVHS). We organized training in communications on intent of treatment (palliative vs curative) and added optional checkboxes to our electronic templates for progress notes. Afterwards, we conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records of initially often randomly selected patient charts. The first 10 patient charts after 1 month of implementation showed intent of treatment in 80 % of charts compared to 74 % at baseline. We then changed checkboxes from mandatory to optional and reviewed 30 randomly selected patient charts. Intent of treatment was documented in 96.7 % of cases compared to 74 % at baseline. We also assessed patient satisfaction through surveys distributed in clinic. Patient satisfaction scores were close to 100 % for receiving clear information, understanding the reason for which they were receiving chemotherapy, and willingness of oncologists to listen carefully, to take time to answer questions, to explain things clearly, and to spend adequate time with them. In this study, we showed that training in communication of intent of chemotherapy and use of checkboxes in progress note templates could improve competency in communication of intent of therapy in cancer patients.

摘要

我们运用标准化的美国临床肿瘤学会肿瘤医疗质量改进计划(QOPI)指南来评估优质癌症护理情况,发现在阿肯色大学医学科学部(UAMS)和阿肯色州中部退伍军人医疗系统(CAVHS)的项目中,关于化疗意图的沟通是一个需要改进的领域。我们组织了关于治疗意图(姑息性治疗与根治性治疗)沟通的培训,并在电子病历模板中添加了可选的复选框。之后,我们对最初随机选取的患者病历的电子医疗记录进行了回顾性审查。实施1个月后的前10份患者病历显示,80%的病历中有治疗意图,而基线时这一比例为74%。然后,我们将复选框从必填改为可选,并审查了30份随机选取的患者病历。96.7%的病例记录了治疗意图,而基线时为74%。我们还通过在诊所发放的调查问卷评估了患者满意度。对于收到清晰的信息、理解接受化疗的原因以及肿瘤学家愿意认真倾听、花时间回答问题、清楚解释事情并与他们充分交流,患者满意度得分接近100%。在本研究中,我们表明化疗意图沟通培训以及在病程记录模板中使用复选框可提高癌症患者治疗意图沟通能力。

相似文献

1
Improving Communication on Intent of Chemotherapy Using QOPI Scores and PDSA Cycles.利用QOPI评分和PDSA循环改善化疗意向沟通
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Dec;31(4):736-741. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0897-x.
2
Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Measure Adherence Between Oncology Fellows, Advanced Practice Providers, and Attending Physicians.肿瘤学质量实践倡议(QOPI)指标在肿瘤学研究员、高级实践提供者和主治医生之间的依从性比较。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):774-8. doi: 10.1007/s13187-015-0798-z.
3
Comparison of Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Metrics in Solid Tumor Oncology Clinic With or Without Concomitant Supportive Oncology Consultation.比较实体瘤肿瘤学临床科室是否同时进行支持性肿瘤学咨询的质量肿瘤学实践倡议指标。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 Dec;14(12):e786-e793. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00380.
4
Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.在一所大学综合癌症中心实施肿瘤学质量实践倡议。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3802-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6770. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
5
Addressing Opioid-Associated Constipation Using Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Scores and Plan-Do-Study-Act Cycles.利用肿瘤学质量实践倡议评分和计划-实施-研究-改进循环来解决阿片类药物相关性便秘问题。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jan;13(1):e91-e97. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.013797. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
6
Important information about clinical practice guidelines: key tools for improving quality of care and patient outcomes.临床实践指南的重要信息:提高医疗质量和患者治疗效果的关键工具。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Feb;12(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12079. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Improving patient satisfaction in dermatology: a prospective study of an urban dermatology clinic.提高皮肤科患者满意度:一项针对城市皮肤科诊所的前瞻性研究。
Cutis. 2017 Apr;99(4):273-278.
8
Improving quality of care by standardising patient data collection in electronic medical records in an oncology department in Spain.提高西班牙肿瘤科电子病历中患者数据采集的标准化水平,改善医疗服务质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 19;13(2):e002732. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002732.
9
Using quality oncology practice initiative metrics for physician incentive compensation.使用肿瘤学实践质量指标来进行医生激励补偿。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Jan;10(1):58-62. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.000953. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Prognosis, Treatment Benefit and Goals of Care: What do Oncologists Discuss with Patients who have Incurable Cancer?预后、治疗益处及护理目标:肿瘤学家与患有无法治愈癌症的患者讨论哪些内容?
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2016 Mar;28(3):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and unintended consequences of hard-stop alerts in electronic health record systems: a systematic review.电子健康记录系统中强制停止警报的效果和意外后果:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1556-1566. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy112.

本文引用的文献

1
Peer feedback as an aid to learning--what do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!同伴反馈作为一种学习辅助手段——我们想要什么?反馈。我们什么时候想要?现在!
Med Teach. 2011;33(2):e105-12. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.542522.
2
Peer-assisted learning from three perspectives: student, tutor and co-ordinator.从学生、辅导教师和协调员三个视角看同伴辅助学习。
Clin Teach. 2010 Dec;7(4):244-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00399.x.
3
The quality oncology practice initiative: assessing and improving care within the medical oncology practice.
肿瘤学优质医疗实践倡议:评估并改善肿瘤内科医疗服务
J Oncol Pract. 2006 Jan;2(1):26-30. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2006.2.1.26.
4
Study designs for PDSA quality improvement research.用于计划-实施-检查-处理(PDSA)质量改进研究的研究设计
Qual Manag Health Care. 2004 Jan-Mar;13(1):17-32. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200401000-00002.