Kim Eric H, Strope Seth A
Division of Urology, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Division of Urology, Washington University, St Louis, MO.
Urol Oncol. 2015 Dec;33(12):499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
The American Urological Association and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines regarding postoperative surveillance for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have provided a standardized framework for imaging following nephrectomy. These stage-stratified recommendations are based on retrospective studies that identified the timeline and location of RCC recurrences. However, the simplified and generalizable protocols offered by the American Urological Association and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network are not without limitations. Studies have found that RCC recurrences continue to be missed even with perfect compliance to these protocols and that RCC recurrences occur not infrequently after the required surveillance window of 5 years. Furthermore, recent studies evaluating the use of adjuvant systemic therapy in patients who are at a high risk for RCC recurrence or metastasis after nephrectomy have yielded disappointing results. This calls into question what interventions we can offer patients to improve survival once RCC recurrences are detected during postoperative surveillance; an effective surveillance strategy requires effective treatment options. The future of personalized medicine with genetic profiling of patients with RCC may offer a potential solution by providing better risk stratification to determine the intensity of surveillance imaging as well as to determine which patients will actually derive survival benefit from intervention on recurrent disease.
美国泌尿外科学会和美国国立综合癌症网络关于肾细胞癌(RCC)术后监测的指南为肾切除术后的影像学检查提供了标准化框架。这些根据分期分层的建议基于回顾性研究,这些研究确定了RCC复发的时间线和位置。然而,美国泌尿外科学会和美国国立综合癌症网络提供的简化且可推广的方案并非没有局限性。研究发现,即使严格遵守这些方案,仍有RCC复发未被发现,并且在5年的规定监测期后,RCC复发并不罕见。此外,最近评估肾切除术后有RCC复发或转移高风险患者辅助全身治疗使用情况的研究结果令人失望。这就引发了一个问题,即一旦在术后监测中发现RCC复发,我们能为患者提供哪些干预措施来提高生存率;有效的监测策略需要有效的治疗选择。对RCC患者进行基因谱分析的个性化医疗未来可能会提供一个潜在的解决方案,通过提供更好的风险分层来确定监测成像的强度,以及确定哪些患者实际上会从对复发性疾病的干预中获得生存益处。